Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Appleton vs Lea Ma Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Appleton vs Ma analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Appleton vs Lea Ma Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Appleton has won 46.8% of points on his second serve, while Ma has won 45.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Appleton, in recent form, has won 53.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ma has won 61.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.23% and 41.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Appleton has saved 56.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ma has saved 53.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Appleton has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 35/ 30), with Ma winning 63.46% (W/L 33/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Ma has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 25/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 33/ 27), where as Ma has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.46% of matches (W/L 33/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Appleton winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Appleton winning 2 and Ma winning 0. The last match between Appleton and Ma was at the W15 Cancun, 15-03-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Emily Appleton getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Appleton and Ma have played a deciding set 0 times, with Appleton winning 0 times and Ma 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Appleton winning 0, and Ma 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Appleton has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.69 while Ma has played against players with an average rank of 216.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Appleton has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ma has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Appleton has converted 40.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ma has converted 50.6% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Appleton 1 - 0 Ma
396
Rank
368
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
578
Rank
578
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
50% (178-176)
Career Total W/L
60% (39-26)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
64% (14-8)
$2,804
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emily Appleton | Lea Ma |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:0 | 1:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (48/72) | 65% (35/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (35/48) | 60% (21/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (14/24) | 58% (11/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/9) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (22/54) | 32% (23/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Emily Appleton
Player
Lea Ma
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Appleton | Lea Ma |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 64% (14/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (31/26) | 67% (28/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (267/266) | 57% (221/169) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (8/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 67% (6/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.69 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 179 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.57 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 150 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:55 | 1:29:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 283.31 | 266.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (957/1661) | 57% (684/1190) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (684/957) | 63% (430/684) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (332/704) | 45% (226/505) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (71/194) | 50% (84/167) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (739/1821) | 49% (596/1215) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (15/11) | 64% (14/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 74% (14/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 100% (14/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 0% (14/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (8/0) |
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Emily Appleton
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Noelia Manta
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Ivana Corley
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
77)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Emily Appleton
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
43%
(
42 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
8
Aces
10
14
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Olivia Gram
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
12
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Emily Appleton
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
5
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
6
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lea Ma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Shuo Feng
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Lea Ma
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
51%
(
24 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
39
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Akiko Omae
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Lea Ma
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Lea Ma
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Saki Imamura
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Lea Ma
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
53)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Adriana Reami
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Appleton Vs Ma Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
