Emily Appleton vs Helena JANSEN Figueras Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Appleton vs Figueras analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Appleton vs Helena JANSEN Figueras Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Appleton has won 46.57% of points on his second serve, while Figueras has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Appleton, in recent form, has won 53.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while Figueras has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.91% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Appleton has saved 55.87% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Figueras has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Appleton has won 51.56% of matches played (W/L 33/ 31), with Figueras winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Figueras has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.54% of matches (W/L 31/ 28), where as Figueras has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Appleton has played against opponents with an average rank of 317.22 while Figueras has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Appleton has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Figueras has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Appleton has converted 38.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Figueras has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Appleton 0 - 0 Figueras
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Emily Appleton | Helena JANSEN Figueras |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 57% (12/9) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 53% (25/22) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (217/220) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.77 | N/A |
Aces Total | 165 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.57 | N/A |
DFs Total | 121 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:5 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 325.57 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 57% (776/1360) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 72% (561/776) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (285/584) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (49/148) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 39% (563/1460) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | N/A |
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Manon Leonard
Player
Emily Appleton
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Emily Appleton
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
43%
(
42 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
8
Aces
10
14
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emily Appleton
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Emily Appleton
Player
Olivia Gram
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
12
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Emily Appleton
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
5
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
6
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Emily Appleton
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emily Appleton
Player
Gaelle Desperrier
58%
(
68 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
115
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Emily Appleton
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emily Appleton
Player
Amelie Van Impe
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
14
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ella Seidel
Player
Emily Appleton
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Helena JANSEN Figueras Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Louise Brunskog
Player
Helena Jansen Figueras
74%
(
91 of
123)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
115)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
9
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
49%
(
60 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
64 of
115)
127
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Erika Drozd Pereira
Player
Helena Jansen Figueras
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chiraz Bechri
Player
Helena Jansen Figueras
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
3
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Helena Jansen Figueras
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Victoria Muntean
Player
Helena Jansen Figueras
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more