F. Jorge
To Win
M. Sieg
To Win
Emily Appleton vs Francisca Jorge Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
W L W W L L W L L LHead-to-head: Appleton 2 - 0 Jorge
They have played 5 sets in total, with Appleton winning 4 and Jorge winning 1. The last match between Appleton and Jorge was at the W35 Manchester, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Emily Appleton getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
W35 Manchester(18-02-2025)
6
1
6
1
Upcoming Match
- / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sherif VS Sun PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rakhimova VS Blinkova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Emily Appleton
Player
Francisca Jorge
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats
2
H2H Matches
0
4
Sets Won
1
28
Games Won
15
8
Aces (Total)
0
1
Total Double Faults
0
0:28:58
Average Match Time
0:28:58
80% (33/41)
1st Serve %
63% (24/38)
73% (24/33)
1st Serve Win %
54% (13/24)
63% (5/8)
2nd Serve Win %
29% (4/14)
71% (5/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
55% (21/38)
Return Points Win %
29% (12/41)
100% (2/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emily Appleton vs Francisca Jorge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Emily Appleton 2 - 0 Francisca Jorge
- Recent form analysis of second serve performance: In the past six months, Appleton has exhibited a commendable display by winning 46.75% of points on their second serve. Conversely, Jorge's recent performance stands at 43.21%. These statistics bear a striking resemblance to the accuracy of match predictions, signifying a significant correlation between the two.
- Insight into return game statistics: Delving into the intricacies of return game statistics reveals that Appleton has demonstrated prowess in recent form, securing a victory in 51.4% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Jorge's recent track record showcases a 52.06% success rate in this aspect. When it comes to returns on the first serve, Appleton triumphs in 33.73% of cases, while Jorge prevails in 38.99%. These numbers hold tremendous significance as they help ascertain the favored player in this head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Analysis of performance in high-pressure situations: A glimpse into the ability of players to handle pressure reveals that Appleton has effectively saved 67.14% of breakpoints during their recent matches. In contrast, Jorge exhibits a slightly lower but still noteworthy statistic of 57.4%. This particular metric proves invaluable in providing insights for in-game betting predictions.
- Comprehensive overview of performance: Evaluating the overall performance of Appleton and Jorge over the span of a year indicates that Appleton emerges victorious in 53.7% of their matches (with a win/loss record of 29/25), while Jorge stands at 46.67% (winning 28 out of 60 matches). These figures provide a holistic prediction overview of their head-to-head encounters.
- Surface expertise: Assessing the players' performance on different surfaces highlights Appleton's dominance on indoor hard courts, where they boast a 55% win rate (52 victories and 42 losses). Conversely, their performance on grass courts leaves something to be desired, with a win rate of only 41% (13 wins and 19 losses). Jorge's best performance is also on indoor hard courts, securing a 59% win rate (37 wins and 26 losses). Conversely, their performance on grass courts is lackluster, with an abysmal 0% win rate (0 wins out of 1 game).
- Player level analysis: Within the past year, Appleton predominantly participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10,000. Impressively, they triumphed in 58.7% of their matches (winning 27 out of 46 games). Jorge, on the other hand, primarily competed in similar tournaments, winning 49.06% of their matches (26 victories out of 53). Comparing these statistics is crucial when predicting the favorite, considering the level at which these players have been contending.
- Past head-to-head encounters: The two players have crossed paths on one occasion, resulting in Appleton emerging victorious. Jorge, unfortunately, failed to secure a victory. These encounters concluded after three sets, with Appleton conquering two of them and Jorge managing to seize one. Notably, their last showdown occurred in Obidos on April 17, 2018, during the Carpet round, and concluded with Emily Appleton triumphing with a score of 4-6, 6-4, 6-3.
- Examination of typical match duration: Drawing from past head-to-head matches, the average duration of the games between these players remains indeterminable, at 0:0:0. This metric provides insights into the overall pace and competitiveness of their encounters.
- Prediction for deciding set scenarios: Appleton and Jorge have encountered decisive sets on one occasion. In this scenario, Appleton emerged victorious, whereas Jorge failed to secure a win. This information proves immensely useful when it comes to predicting the outcome of this match, particularly if it extends to the maximum number of sets.
- Under scrutiny: extreme pressure situations in head-to-head encounters: Interestingly, the two players have never experienced tiebreaks against one another. Therefore, Appleton and Jorge remain equal with zero victories in these high-stakes situations.
- Evaluation of opponents' quality: Over the course of the previous 12 months, Appleton has competed against opponents with an average rank of 329.41, while Jorge's opponents averaged a rank of 255.87. These statistics provide an indication of the challenges and level of competition both players have faced.
- Deciding set performance against all players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, understanding how players perform in deciding sets is crucial. Appleton boasts a commendable 50% success rate in such situations over the past year. In comparison, Jorge's performance stands at a modest 7% in the matches they have played during their touring career.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While analyzing past performances undoubtedly assists in predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to consider the ongoing event's statistics to gauge players' current form. For a comprehensive understanding of in-form players, referring to the section below will prove beneficial. Furthermore, certain players often excel in specific events, and this factor should be taken into account when predicting the match outcome.
- Break point conversion: Recent statistics indicate that Appleton converts 39.22% of breakpoint opportunities, while Jorge capitalizes on 41.12% of chances to break their opponent's serve. These figures hold significant weight and provide valuable insights for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you have an inclination towards models predicting tennis matches, you may find this article insightful. However, be warned: it caters primarily to the interest of statistics enthusiasts.
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Christasha McNeil
Player
Emily Appleton
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Ariana Arseneault
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Dasha Ivanova
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Elizabeth Ionescu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
78%
(
56 of
72)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Krisha Mahendran
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Malaika Rapolu
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
85)
14
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Valentina Ivanov
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Fiona Crawley
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
13
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Klara Kosan
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Victoria Gomez
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
24%
(
6 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Francisca Jorge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Francisca Jorge
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Francisca Jorge
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Francisca Jorge
70%
(
70 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisca Jorge
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Francisca Jorge
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisca Jorge
Player
Oleksandra Oliynykova
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisca Jorge
Player
Rebeka Masarova
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Francisca Jorge
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
40%
(
21 of
53)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Francisca Jorge
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
46 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 7-6(5) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
52% (211/198)
Win/Loss
56% (235/185)
52% (482/449)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (530/427)
51% (4408/4193)
Games Win/Loss
53% (4573/4092)
50% (61/60)
Hard Win/Loss
58% (112/82)
46% (56/65)
Clay Win/Loss
52% (59/54)
60% (81/54)
Indoor Hard W/L
57% (64/48)
41% (13/19)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/1)
0.39
Aces Per Game
0.12
1658
Aces Total
494
0.47
Double Faults Per Game
0.17
1990
Total Double Faults
721
1:26:6
Average Match Time
1:32:34
494.28
Average Opponent Rank
440.16
59% (14493/24719)
1st Serve %
65% (16709/25847)
68% (9869/14493)
1st Serve Win %
60% (10027/16709)
43% (4445/10225)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (4304/9138)
45% (1301/2863)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (1580/3352)
43% (10936/25217)
Return Points Win %
47% (11842/25424)
0% (0/2)
Slam W/L
0% (0/4)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
55% (6/5)
31% (4/9)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
45% (107/133)
Challenger W/L
56% (158/123)
65% (100/54)
Futures W/L
57% (71/53)
51% (210/408)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (229/413)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
49% (40/81)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (45/83)
46% (53/114)
Deciding Set Win %
46% (56/121)
85% (220/186)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (237/201)
15% (220/34)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (237/36)
13% (189/25)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
18% (182/33)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
