Emily Appleton vs Elizabeth Mandlik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L L W L
Form
W L W W W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Appleton 0 - 1 Mandlik
They have played 2 sets in total, with Appleton winning 0 and Mandlik winning 2. The last match between Appleton and Mandlik was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat, 17-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Elizabeth Mandlik getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emily Appleton | 0 |
| Elizabeth Mandlik | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat(17-05-2025)
Elizabeth Mandlik
Emily Appleton
6
4
6
4
| Appleton | Stats | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (24-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (19-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 400 | Ranking | 255 |
| 348 | Highest Rank | 97 |
| 25 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 8 |
| 51% (218-207) | Career Total W/L | 56% (183-142) |
| $5,694 | Career Prize Money | $317,135 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tomic VS Jong PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
21 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bublik VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
21 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emily Appleton
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
2
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
8
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:47:41 | Average Match Time | 1:47:41 |
| 60% (51/85) | 1st Serve % | 66% (59/90) |
| 53% (27/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (35/59) |
| 38% (13/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) |
| 24% (4/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (6/15) |
| 47% (42/90) | Return Points Win % | 53% (45/85) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Appleton vs Mandlik Match Preview :
- Second serve performance in recent months shows Appleton slightly ahead, winning 40.19% compared to Mandlik's 39.76%.
- Mandlik excels in return games, winning 56.26% of opponents' second serves and 36.95% on first serve returns, surpassing Appleton's 51.41% and 27.93%, respectively.
- Under pressure, Appleton saves 48.77% of breakpoints, marginally better than Mandlik's 45.78%.
- Appleton has a higher overall match win rate over the last year at 58.06%, compared to Mandlik's 51.79%.
- On surfaces, both have a 59% win rate on their preferred courts: Appleton on indoor hard and Mandlik on hard courts. Is this a key factor?
- In Challengers/ITF tournaments, Appleton performs better with a 58.14% win rate versus Mandlik's 52.38%.
- Appleton competes against players with an average ranking of 334.85, while Mandlik's opponents have an average ranking of 282.84, indicating Mandlik faces tougher competition.
- Appleton fares well in deciding sets, winning 59% compared to Mandlik's 36% over the past year. Could endurance be Apple's advantage?
- Appleton converts 36.45% of breakpoints, but Mandlik is better at 43.43%, highlighting a potential edge in high-pressure situations.
Editorial Prediction (May 17, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the data, both players have competitive strengths, but clear differences emerge. While Appleton shows superior consistency in winning matches and handling pressure, Mandlik's return game and break point conversion prowess might challenge Apple's defense.
Mandlik may have faced tougher opponents on average, suggesting experience at a higher level, but Appleton's higher deciding set win rate indicates strong performance in critical moments.
The surface preference balance out, but Mandlik's exceptional return stats are significant. However, Appleton's comprehensive gameplay could prevail.
Considering all factors, though the match appears balanced, Appleton is slightly favored to win, leveraging consistent performance and strategic play under pressure.
Appleton vs Mandlik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Emily Appleton
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
13
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Simona Waltert
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Emily Appleton
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
0-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emily Appleton
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
2
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
8
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Amelia Rajecki
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Jordyn Mcbride
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
53 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Josy Daems
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Vivian Wolff
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Antonia Schmidt
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
81 of
116)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
57 of
116)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Sada Nahimana
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Lea Boskovic
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (218/207) | Win/Loss | 56% (183/142) |
| 51% (499/471) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (417/340) |
| 51% (4575/4368) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3667/3286) |
| 51% (64/62) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (101/69) |
| 46% (59/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (72/59) |
| 60% (81/54) | Indoor Hard W/L | 13% (1/7) |
| 40% (14/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1710 | Aces Total | 518 |
| 0.48 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 2084 | Total Double Faults | 1380 |
| 1:26:32 | Average Match Time | 1:32:56 |
| 492.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 392.21 |
| 59% (15172/25827) | 1st Serve % | 56% (11755/21060) |
| 68% (10298/15172) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7318/11755) |
| 43% (4620/10654) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4170/9304) |
| 45% (1365/3011) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1408/2725) |
| 43% (11440/26347) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9983/20976) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 50% (11/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 27% (4/11) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (23/22) |
| 45% (114/140) | Challenger W/L | 55% (103/85) |
| 65% (100/54) | Futures W/L | 72% (42/16) |
| 51% (217/424) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (180/321) |
| 48% (41/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (22/61) |
| 47% (57/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (57/111) |
| 84% (226/190) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (177/155) |
| 16% (226/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (177/22) |
| 14% (199/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (148/28) |
Appleton vs. Mandlik Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
