M. Krueger
To Win
A. Ghibaudo
To Win
Emilio Nava vs Mitchell Krueger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L W L
Form
W W L L L W L L L WHead To Head: Nava 1 - 0 Krueger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Krueger winning 0. The last match between Nava and Krueger was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Emilio Nava getting the victory 7-6(6) 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | 1 |
| Mitchell Krueger | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(23-06-2025)
Emilio Nava
Mitchell Krueger
7
6
7
6
| Nava | Stats | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (39-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (16-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 119 | Ranking | 164 |
| 119 | Highest Rank | 135 |
| 23 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 59% (227-155) | Career Total W/L | 53% (439-394) |
| $600,885 | Career Prize Money | $1,082,108 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
11 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
21
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:38:0 | Average Match Time | 1:38:0 |
| 65% (52/80) | 1st Serve % | 75% (57/76) |
| 83% (43/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (40/57) |
| 57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 79% (15/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 28% (21/76) | Return Points Win % | 26% (21/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nava vs Krueger Match Preview :
- How do the players compare in their recent second serve performances? Nava has secured 46.24% of points, slightly behind Krueger who has achieved 46.87%.
- In terms of returning games, Nava holds an advantage by winning 47.35% of opponent's second serve points, compared to Krueger’s 46.1%.
- First serve return stats indicate Krueger is stronger, having won 27.58% compared to Nava’s 24.9%.
- Under pressure, with breakpoints saved, Krueger demonstrates strength, saving 56.12%, while Nava has saved 53.39%.
- Nava’s winning streak in the past year shows a 61.18% success rate, surpassing Krueger's 46.77%.
- Which surface suits the players best? Both excel on clay, with Nava achieving a 67% win rate and Krueger 56%.
- Nava boasts a higher win percentage, 67.57%, in Challengers/ITF tournaments compared to Krueger’s 41.94%.
- The average opponent ranking Nava has faced is 267.27, while Krueger faced tougher competition with an average ranking of 227.31.
- Nava fares better in deciding sets, winning 52% of them over the last year against Krueger’s 40% success rate.
- Break point conversion success stands at 35% for Nava, marginally better than Krueger's 33.51%.
Editorial Prediction (June 22, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Nava and Krueger brings together competitors with close second serve success but diverging strengths in other areas. Nava's slight edge in converting return points and break points could be pivotal moments during their match.
Krueger's slight advantage in saving breakpoints and returning first serves might balance Nava's strengths, making for an intriguing matchup. The higher stakes and tougher opponents Krueger has faced could contribute to his performance.
Overall, Nava’s consistent performance over the past year, his capability in tight deciding set scenarios, and his solid form in high-pressure situations suggest he is more likely to prevail in this match.
Nava vs Krueger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
21
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Ryan Peniston
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jack Pinnington Jones
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
121)
26
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
84%
(
66 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
28%
(
31 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
44 of
121)
125
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-7(10) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Emilio Nava
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Andrej Martin
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
7
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
21
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
10
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
13
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
49 of
61)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Mitchell Krueger
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (227/155) | Win/Loss | 53% (439/394) |
| 56% (505/393) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1037/927) |
| 52% (4553/4234) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (9600/9183) |
| 55% (89/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (272/233) |
| 67% (105/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (124/97) |
| 55% (28/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (33/47) |
| 42% (5/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 37% (10/17) |
| 0.53 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2278 | Aces Total | 2879 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1078 | Total Double Faults | 1675 |
| 1:36:56 | Average Match Time | 1:23:19 |
| 368.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 519.66 |
| 63% (16575/26453) | 1st Serve % | 62% (29849/48298) |
| 71% (11775/16575) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (20627/29849) |
| 51% (5077/9878) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9376/18449) |
| 42% (976/2337) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1811/4399) |
| 38% (10017/26532) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18678/48745) |
| 54% (14/12) | Slam W/L | 45% (27/33) |
| 40% (8/12) | Masters W/L | 39% (12/19) |
| 41% (9/13) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (36/37) |
| 62% (148/92) | Challenger W/L | 49% (237/243) |
| 65% (48/26) | Futures W/L | 67% (127/62) |
| 60% (221/371) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (428/816) |
| 44% (4/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 48% (80/166) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (130/282) |
| 60% (75/124) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (130/289) |
| 86% (213/184) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (447/363) |
| 14% (213/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (447/84) |
| 25% (169/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (386/72) |
Nava vs. Krueger Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
