E. Nava
To Win
B. V. D. Zandschulp
To Win
Emilio Nava vs Mathys Erhard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L L W L L
Form
W W W L L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Nava 2 - 0 Erhard
They have played 5 sets in total, with Nava winning 4 and Erhard winning 1. The last match between Nava and Erhard was at the Tallahassee Challenger, 19-04-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Emilio Nava getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | 2 |
| Mathys Erhard | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tallahassee Challenger(19-04-2025)
Emilio Nava
Mathys Erhard
6
2
6
4
| Nava | Stats | Erhard |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (32-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (13-13) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 138 | Ranking | 268 |
| 124 | Highest Rank | 265 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 59% (220-150) | Career Total W/L | 61% (241-152) |
| $442,385 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
- / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pavlyuchenkova VS Zheng PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Lehecka VS Thompson PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 17 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:35:53 | Average Match Time | 1:35:53 |
| 61% (83/136) | 1st Serve % | 61% (72/119) |
| 77% (64/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (51/72) |
| 51% (27/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (20/47) |
| 73% (8/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 40% (48/119) | Return Points Win % | 33% (45/136) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nava vs Erhard Match Preview :
Welcome to the clash of the titans featuring Nava and Erhard, where their second serves play a game of "anything you can do, I can do slightly better." Nava has managed to score a commendable 46.98% of points from their second serve in the past six months, while Erhard follows closely with a "don't leave me behind" 45.94%. So, you could say they're both neck-and-neck in the race of "second serve supremacy," which has the experts nodding sagely and saying, "Ah, yes, the stats have spoken."
When it comes to breaking hearts and breaking serves, Nava and Erhard are virtually tied in their return game analysis, sniping 47.06% and 47.08% of their opponents' second serve points, respectively. But it's Erhard who sneaks in with a cheeky rage on first serve returns with 29.78%, leaving Nava trailing at 25.01%. Analysts throw their stats into a blender, and the outcome is that Erhard's first-serve magic trick might just get him more attention in this head-to-head tango.
Speaking of breaking—breakpoints, that is—Nava saves the day on 53.12% of occasions, whereas Erhard goes all Superman and saves 57.81% of breakpoints. It’s a thriller match scenario, like a tennis James Bond movie where you're never quite sure who will save their serve until the very last second. This is the type of intel you'll thank your lucky stars for when you're trying to predict which player can keep their cool under the pressure cooker that is competitive tennis.
Performance reviews? Let's just say Nava's had a busy year, winning 59.26% of encounters (W/L 48/33), while Erhard has been living it up with a winning percentage of 71.08% (W/L 59/24). In the grand scheme of things, winning is quite passé unless you're Erhard, in which case winning, or at least winning more often than not, is entirely trendy.
With clay courts being their shared BFF, Nava saunters in with a 69% career win rate, while Erhard settles for a respectable 66%. But all is not sunshine and roses on grass and indoor hard courts, geographical regions that seem to have conspired against their talents. Grass courts make Nava wish for a packed lunch as he strolls and slips with a 29% (W/L 2/5), and Erhard grumbles against indoor hard courts with a win symmetry of 32% (W/L 6/13). Seems like clay is the only thing that stands by these players through thick and thin.
Navigating the tennis tournament levels like a GPS on a road trip, Nava has mostly dabbled in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, boasting a 67.14% win record (W/L 47/23). Meanwhile, Erhard has been busy conquering Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K with an awe-inspiring 82.22% win record (W/L 37/8). And let’s not forget, the statistics here are heavily influenced by the patchy road maps of their recent travel calendars.
Nava has had the better of their direct exchanges, winning their sole previous encounter. That day, April 16, 2024, on the quaint Oeiras Challenger clay, Nava staged an epic three-set comeback, ending on a sweet note 4-6, 6-3, 6-2. In the daunting yet electrifying world of deciding sets, Nava clutches a 52% win rate, narrowly outkind-ed by Erhard's 54%. Their match saga is a time-bending marvel, averaging a mere whisper over two hours. It's the sort of showdown designed to push spectators to the edge of their seats and perhaps change the way humans understand proportion and probability altogether.
In a nutshell, with all metrics considered (serve stats, return stats, clutch saves, and decoding long, epic tiebreak-less duels), this wise soothsayer predicted battle seems nudging its celestial odds in Erhard's favor. So get your popcorn ready, and may the odds—and the line calls—be ever in your favor.
Nava vs Erhard Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Emilio Nava
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Emilio Nava
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Dan Added
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Emilio Nava
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mathys Erhard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Mathys Erhard
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
James McCabe
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Mathys Erhard
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
83%
(
63 of
76)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Mathys Erhard
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Mathys Erhard
82%
(
63 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
85 of
127)
1st Serve %
66%
(
84 of
127)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
57 of
84)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
46 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
46 of
127)
127
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (220/150) | Win/Loss | 61% (241/152) |
| 56% (489/381) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (540/369) |
| 52% (4398/4095) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4654/3924) |
| 55% (89/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (31/29) |
| 67% (101/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (203/109) |
| 55% (28/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (7/14) |
| 29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 2153 | Aces Total | 819 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1044 | Total Double Faults | 930 |
| 1:36:42 | Average Match Time | 1:30:44 |
| 371.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 421.29 |
| 63% (15972/25525) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14663/22432) |
| 71% (11316/15972) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9742/14663) |
| 52% (4920/9553) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3841/7768) |
| 42% (947/2269) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1209/2663) |
| 38% (9668/25571) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9949/22988) |
| 55% (12/10) | Slam W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 40% (8/12) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (9/13) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (143/89) | Challenger W/L | 49% (45/46) |
| 65% (48/26) | Futures W/L | 65% (195/103) |
| 60% (215/361) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (237/386) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 48% (76/158) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (53/94) |
| 61% (74/122) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (65/124) |
| 86% (205/177) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (232/203) |
| 14% (205/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (232/28) |
| 25% (165/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (161/38) |
Nava vs. Erhard Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
