Emilio Nava vs Liam Draxl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W W L W L
Form
W W W L L W W W L LH2H: Nava 1 - 0 Draxl
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Draxl winning 0. The last match between Nava and Draxl was at the Sarasota Challenger, 13-04-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Clay, with Emilio Nava getting the victory 6-2 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | 1 |
| Liam Draxl | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Sarasota Challenger(13-04-2025)
Emilio Nava
Liam Draxl
6
2
7
6
| Nava | Stats | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (36-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (28-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 119 | Ranking | 148 |
| 119 | Highest Rank | 142 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 8 |
| 59% (224-153) | Career Total W/L | 65% (193-104) |
| $559,385 | Career Prize Money | $3,650 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Diallo VS Humbert PREDICTION Grass
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch atp
14 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Aliassime VS Fritz PREDICTION Grass
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
14 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Liam Draxl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:31:28 | Average Match Time | 1:31:28 |
| 55% (30/55) | 1st Serve % | 75% (56/75) |
| 80% (24/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (33/56) |
| 52% (13/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 47% (35/75) | Return Points Win % | 33% (18/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nava vs Draxl Match Preview :
In assessing the second serve performance over the last six months, Nava has demonstrated a modest advantage, winning 47.52% of points compared to Draxl’s 42.36%. This metric is a significant indicator when forecasting match outcomes, highlighting Nava's stronger position in this aspect.
Return game statistics reveal that, although Draxl excels on the return of second serves, claiming 49.08% of points, Nava remains competitive with 47.47%. Contrasting this is their performance against first serves, where Nava edges out Draxl slightly, with 25.39% success compared to 24.9%. These insights are crucial when predicting the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Analyzing the under-pressure performance, Draxl slightly outperforms with a 53.07% breakpoint save rate, compared to Nava’s 51.87%. This figure is particularly useful for live betting insights, suggesting Draxl’s resilience under pressure.
Looking at general performance, Draxl leads overall, having won a notable 71.26% of his matches in the last year (W/L 62/25), in contrast to Nava's 56.96% (W/L 45/34). This offers a comprehensive view of each player's recent success and provides a broader head-to-head prediction overview.
The players' surface preferences reveal that Nava is most successful on clay, with a 68% win rate (W/L 95/45) while struggling on grass with just 29% (W/L 2/5). Draxl, however, prefers indoor hard courts where he boasts a 69% win rate (W/L 50/22), finding clay less favorable, albeit still strong at 62% (W/L 47/29). These statistics are fundamental when considering surface-specific match predictions.
Analyzing player level, both competitors majorly participate in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Draxl is marginally more successful at this level, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 38/18), compared to Nava's 64.71% (W/L 44/24). Contextualizing stats within the event's level is vital to understand the relevancy of their performances.
When examining opponent quality, Nava has faced stronger competition averaged at rank 254.66, while Draxl's opponents average a rank of 332 over the past year. This detail provides further dimension to their respective success rates and levels of competition faced.
Performance in deciding sets reveals Draxl's dominance, having secured victory in 68% of deciders in the past year, overshadowing Nava’s 54%. This stat is particularly valuable for live predictions if the match reaches a crucial third set.
Focusing on breakpoint conversion, Nava leads with a higher conversion rate of 37.23% compared to Draxl’s 30.25%, an influential metric for live betting predictions when breakpoint opportunities arise.
Overall, while Nava shows strength in certain statistical areas such as second serve points and breakpoint conversion, Draxl's superior match win percentage, better performance under pressure, and formidable deciding set record tip the scales in his favor. Based on the analysis of these stats, Draxl is predicted to have the edge in this upcoming match.
Nava vs Draxl Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Emilio Nava
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Andrej Martin
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
7
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Emilio Nava
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
102)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
29 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
83 of
122)
1st Serve %
50%
(
63 of
125)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
44 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
125)
135
Total Points Won
112
|
6-2 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Emilio Nava
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Draxl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Liam Draxl
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve %
75%
(
9 of
12)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
10
Total Points Won
9
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Liam Draxl
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kenta Miyoshi
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Patrick Maloney
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Rafael Jodar
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Liam Draxl
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Liam Draxl
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
80%
(
52 of
65)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (224/153) | Win/Loss | 65% (193/104) |
| 56% (498/388) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (419/245) |
| 52% (4483/4168) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3430/2765) |
| 55% (89/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (91/49) |
| 67% (105/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (52/33) |
| 55% (28/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (50/22) |
| 29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 2198 | Aces Total | 955 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1065 | Total Double Faults | 829 |
| 1:36:41 | Average Match Time | 1:40:33 |
| 282.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.39 |
| 63% (16306/26034) | 1st Serve % | 65% (12072/18481) |
| 71% (11557/16306) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (8375/12072) |
| 51% (5003/9728) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3194/6409) |
| 42% (969/2313) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (961/2037) |
| 38% (9866/26080) | Return Points Win % | 42% (7883/18564) |
| 54% (13/11) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 40% (8/12) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 41% (9/13) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 62% (146/91) | Challenger W/L | 59% (72/50) |
| 65% (48/26) | Futures W/L | 73% (120/45) |
| 60% (218/366) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (188/286) |
| 44% (4/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 48% (76/160) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (43/75) |
| 61% (74/122) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (42/75) |
| 87% (209/181) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (192/175) |
| 13% (209/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (192/15) |
| 25% (168/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (104/19) |
Nava vs. Draxl Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
