Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emilio Nava vs Jack Vance Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nava vs Vance analysis and find out who is favored!
Emilio Nava vs Jack Vance Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 49.37% of points on his second serve, while Vance has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 48.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vance has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.4% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 66.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vance has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 61.84% of matches played (W/L 47/ 29), with Vance winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 61/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20). Vance has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 9/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.22% of matches (W/L 30/ 19), where as Vance has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Vance winning 0. The last match between Nava and Vance was at the USA F25 (Laguna Niguel), 16-09-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Emilio Nava getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Vance have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nava winning 0 times and Vance 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 0, and Vance 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.34 while Vance has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vance has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 38.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vance has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Vance
124
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
60% (169-112)
Career Total W/L
20% (12-49)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$402,385
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emilio Nava | Jack Vance |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emilio Nava | Jack Vance |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (33/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (294/261) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 206 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:27 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 252.38 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1132/1772) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (829/1132) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (323/640) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (57/143) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (602/1691) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Emilio Nava
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
1
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Steve Johnson
60%
(
71 of
118)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
126)
15
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
38 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
126)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(6) 7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Emilio Nava
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Vance Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Nava Vs Vance Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emilio Nava
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
