G. A. Olivieri
To Win
S. Mochizuki
To Win
Emilio Nava vs Genaro Alberto Olivieri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W L L
Form
L W L W W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Nava 1 - 0 Olivieri
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Olivieri winning 0. The last match between Nava and Olivieri was at the Concepcion Challenger, 29-03-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Emilio Nava getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | 1 |
| Genaro Alberto Olivieri | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Concepcion Challenger(29-03-2025)
6
2
6
4
| Nava | Stats | Olivieri |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (31-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (16-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 137 | Ranking | 286 |
| 124 | Highest Rank | 131 |
| 23 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 5 |
| 60% (219-148) | Career Total W/L | 58% (322-235) |
| $442,385 | Career Prize Money | $153,415 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
12 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Jong PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
12 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:23:34 | Average Match Time | 1:23:34 |
| 62% (34/55) | 1st Serve % | 74% (50/68) |
| 79% (27/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (27/50) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 31% (4/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 49% (33/68) | Return Points Win % | 29% (16/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nava vs Olivieri Match Preview :
In assessing the forthcoming tennis encounter between Nava and Olivieri, a variety of statistical measures provide insights into likely performance outcomes. Over the last six months, Nava has outperformed Olivieri in terms of second serve efficiency, winning 46.92% of points compared to Olivieri's 43.56%. This statistic is often indicative of match outcomes.
When considering return game effectiveness, Nava maintains a slight upper hand, claiming 47.77% of points from opponents' second serves compared to Olivieri's 46.17%. In first serve returns, however, Olivieri excels with a figure of 32.08%, surpassing Nava's 26.33%. These elements of return performance often tilt pre-match favorability.
Under pressure, Nava demonstrates resilience, having saved 50.31% of breakpoints, whereas Olivieri has a save rate of 44.35%. Similarly, when it comes to breakpoint opportunity conversion, Olivieri appears slightly more efficient, converting 41.03% of chances against Nava’s 37.77%. These can be crucial for live betting predictions during the match.
From a performance overview standpoint, Nava and Olivieri exhibit almost identical success rates in the past year, with win percentages of 53.42% and 53.62%, respectively. This reflects in their head-to-head prediction balance. Notably, both athletes systematically perform better on clay, with Nava posting a 66% win rate and Olivieri 59%; however, Nava struggles on grass while Olivieri has yet to claim a victory on Indoor Hard courts.
Examining player level statistics reveals Nava’s proficiency in Challenger/ITF tournaments over $10K, having won 61.29% of such matches, compared to Olivieri's 56.06%. However, it's important to note that Nava has faced stiffer competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 250.7 versus Olivieri's 357.67-ranked opponents.
Set performance statistics are yet another telling predictor; in deciding sets, Olivieri shows a slight edge, winning 60% compared to Nava's 54% over the past year. This can be pivotal during close matches that extend into deciding sets. Current tournament form, if applicable, can further fine-tune predictions based on immediate performances.
Summarizing these statistical analyses suggests that while both players are closely matched, Olivieri's slight advantages in breakpoint conversion and first serve return efficiency may tip the balance in his favor. Considering equal surface proficiencies and Nava's tougher competition history, Olivieri emerges as the marginally favored contender to claim victory in this matchup.
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Emilio Nava
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Liam Draxl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Genaro Alberto Olivieri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lautaro Midon
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
85%
(
63 of
74)
1st Serve %
75%
(
58 of
77)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
80%
(
52 of
65)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Andres Martin
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Andres Andrade
86%
(
48 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Mathys Erhard
82%
(
63 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Jagger Leach
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
116)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
116)
99
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
79%
(
41 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (219/148) | Win/Loss | 58% (322/235) |
| 56% (486/377) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (720/579) |
| 52% (4365/4060) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6312/5849) |
| 55% (89/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (39/33) |
| 68% (100/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (283/198) |
| 55% (28/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 2139 | Aces Total | 775 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1037 | Total Double Faults | 1003 |
| 1:36:39 | Average Match Time | 1:42:12 |
| 370.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 423.62 |
| 63% (15829/25307) | 1st Serve % | 65% (22902/35315) |
| 71% (11224/15829) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (14513/22902) |
| 51% (4880/9478) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (6113/12413) |
| 42% (941/2254) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1794/4124) |
| 38% (9600/25372) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15332/35866) |
| 55% (12/10) | Slam W/L | 38% (5/8) |
| 40% (8/12) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (9/12) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (2/6) |
| 62% (142/88) | Challenger W/L | 52% (123/114) |
| 65% (48/26) | Futures W/L | 64% (192/107) |
| 60% (214/358) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (311/541) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (6/8) |
| 48% (76/157) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (69/134) |
| 61% (74/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (106/185) |
| 86% (204/176) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (301/258) |
| 14% (204/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (301/42) |
| 26% (163/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (256/62) |
Nava vs. Olivieri Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
