M. Topo
To Win
E. Nava
To Win
Emilio Nava vs Christian Sigsgaard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L L W L
Form
W W W W L W W L W LHead To Head: Nava 1 - 0 Sigsgaard
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Sigsgaard winning 0. The last match between Nava and Sigsgaard was at the Tallahassee Challenger, 15-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Emilio Nava getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | 1 |
| Christian Sigsgaard | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tallahassee Challenger(15-04-2025)
Emilio Nava
Christian Sigsgaard
6
4
6
4
| Nava | Stats | Sigsgaard |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (32-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (9-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 137 | Ranking | 528 |
| 124 | Highest Rank | 528 |
| 23 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 2 |
| 60% (220-149) | Career Total W/L | 64% (113-64) |
| $442,385 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Udvardy VS Nahimana PREDICTION Clay
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat wta
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Duckworth VS Bertola PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:22:57 | Average Match Time | 1:22:57 |
| 65% (36/55) | 1st Serve % | 65% (51/79) |
| 81% (29/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (33/51) |
| 63% (12/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 25% (2/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (33/79) | Return Points Win % | 25% (14/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nava vs Sigsgaard Match Preview :
Once upon a tennis court, two players prepared to duel under the sizzling sun. In the realm of double-faulting, Sigsgaard’s recent form showed he snatched victory on 42.35% of his second serve points. Meanwhile, Nava, his opponent, managed to outshine Sigsgaard with a 46.84% win rate on his secondary attempt. Frequent skimpy second serves have an uncanny knack for predicting who might dominate the game.
Jumping over the net to the return game, Sigsgaard snagged 45.07% of points from opponents' second serves. However, Nava, armed with his trusty racket, returned with a 47.4% success rate from his adversaries’ second offerings, and when it came to playing yoyo with the first serve, Sigsgaard and Nava were neck and neck, with percentages that would make math teachers weep—26.02% and 25.24% respectively.
In cases where breakpoints attack with laser precision, Sigsgaard saved the day 52.98% of the time, slightly edging out Nava’s 52.56%. Clearly, both players have a knack for clinging on when the going gets tough. Sigsgaard, the reigning monarch of indoor hard courts, boasts a career win percentage of 66%. Grass, however, seems to be his Achilles' heel, with an unfortunate record of 0%—something botanists chalk up to the dangers of tennis shoes on fresh-cut lawns.
On the clay kingdom where dust meets destiny, Nava channeled his inner Rafael Nadal, securing a majestic 68% win percentage, though his grassy exploits fare only a teensy bit better than Sigsgaard, at a slightly prickly 29%. Sigsgaard often graces the humble courts of the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, where he’s secured victory in 72.41% of matches. Nava, however, mingles with a different crowd, partaking in the grand Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with a win rate of 65.22%.
The average rank of opponents tells its own chapter of this tale: Sigsgaard tackles foes with an average rank of 153.97 while Nava finds himself surrounded by challengers averaging at 295.81. If this drama-dude of a match stretches into deciding sets, Sigsgaard reigns as the King of Clutch, winning 67% of these nail-biters. Nava, while respectable, trails behind with a decisive set win rate of 54%. And speaking of clutch moments, Sigsgaard's break point conversion has been a modest 28.75%, whereas Nava’s is an impressive 37.5%.
So, who shall rule this illustrious court encounter? Given the stats spinning the tales of past victories and present prowess, it seems Juan that Nava might just edge out Sigsgaard in this cosmic clash of rackets and wills.
Nava vs Sigsgaard Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Emilio Nava
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Dan Added
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Emilio Nava
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Christian Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Alex Rybakov
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(8) 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
28 of
36)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Marvin Moeller
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (220/149) | Win/Loss | 64% (113/64) |
| 56% (488/379) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (252/148) |
| 52% (4387/4080) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2078/1660) |
| 55% (89/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (54/31) |
| 68% (101/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (30/18) |
| 55% (28/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (29/14) |
| 29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2148 | Aces Total | 390 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1041 | Total Double Faults | 259 |
| 1:36:40 | Average Match Time | 1:13:5 |
| 370.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 431.33 |
| 63% (15917/25446) | 1st Serve % | 66% (5788/8731) |
| 71% (11282/15917) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3890/5788) |
| 51% (4906/9529) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1552/2943) |
| 42% (945/2266) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (451/939) |
| 38% (9642/25493) | Return Points Win % | 43% (3806/8937) |
| 55% (12/10) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (8/12) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 43% (9/12) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (143/89) | Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 65% (48/26) | Futures W/L | 66% (108/56) |
| 60% (215/360) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (108/170) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 48% (76/158) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (24/44) |
| 61% (74/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (17/43) |
| 86% (205/177) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (117/102) |
| 14% (205/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (117/15) |
| 26% (164/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (60/11) |
Nava vs. Sigsgaard Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
