Emilien Demanet vs Mate Valkusz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W W L L L
Form
L L L L W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Demanet 1 - 0 Valkusz
They have played 2 sets in total, with Demanet winning 2 and Valkusz winning 0. The last match between Demanet and Valkusz was at the M15 Manacor, 21-01-2025, First, Hard with Emilien Demanet getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emilien Demanet | 1 |
| Mate Valkusz | 0 |
M15 Manacor(21-01-2025)
6
0
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Musetti VS Halys PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Blinkova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Emilien Demanet
Player
Mate Valkusz
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
2
2
Aces (Total)
2
0
Total Double Faults
3
1:1:6
Average Match Time
1:1:6
70% (26/37)
1st Serve %
59% (26/44)
65% (17/26)
1st Serve Win %
46% (12/26)
82% (9/11)
2nd Serve Win %
22% (4/18)
60% (6/10)
Break Points Won % (Total)
33% (1/3)
64% (28/44)
Return Points Win %
30% (11/37)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emilien Demanet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Emilien Demanet
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Emilien Demanet
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
11 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Emilien Demanet
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Karl Poling
72%
(
88 of
122)
1st Serve %
68%
(
90 of
133)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
58 of
90)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
50 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Emilien Demanet
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
47%
(
40 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
59 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Liam Delicata
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
51
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Emilien Demanet
66%
(
73 of
110)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Mate Valkusz
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Emilien Demanet
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mate Valkusz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Mate Valkusz
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Mate Valkusz
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Marvin Moeller
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Pedro Araujo
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
51%
(
26 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Mate Valkusz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Mate Valkusz
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Mate Valkusz
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Mate Valkusz
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
53% (41/37)
Win/Loss
66% (208/106)
52% (92/84)
Sets Win/Loss
65% (459/250)
51% (845/826)
Games Win/Loss
56% (3551/2772)
57% (27/20)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (34/21)
50% (13/13)
Clay Win/Loss
71% (167/69)
20% (1/4)
Indoor Hard W/L
32% (7/15)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/1)
0.13
Aces Per Game
0.17
108
Aces Total
516
0.13
Double Faults Per Game
0.24
103
Total Double Faults
745
1:50:46
Average Match Time
1:23:31
459.91
Average Opponent Rank
476.75
68% (3453/5082)
1st Serve %
64% (12131/18924)
61% (2123/3453)
1st Serve Win %
65% (7897/12131)
50% (810/1629)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (3469/6793)
46% (268/579)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (1133/2388)
43% (2258/5202)
Return Points Win %
45% (8665/19305)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
43% (3/4)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
20% (1/4)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
33% (3/6)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L
59% (70/48)
53% (41/36)
Futures W/L
75% (131/44)
51% (39/76)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
70% (204/293)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
10% (1/10)
63% (12/19)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
51% (29/57)
45% (9/20)
Deciding Set Win %
53% (42/80)
84% (44/37)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (215/186)
16% (44/7)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (215/24)
12% (34/4)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (99/21)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
