Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emilie LINDH Gallagher vs Nicole Gadient Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gallagher vs Gadient analysis and find out who is favored!
Emilie LINDH Gallagher vs Nicole Gadient Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gallagher has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gadient has won 46.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gallagher, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gadient has won 62.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gallagher has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gadient has saved 46.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gallagher has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gadient winning 43.24% (W/L 16/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gallagher has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gadient has played against players with an average rank of 80.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gallagher has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gadient has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gallagher has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gadient has converted 61.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gallagher 0 - 0 Gadient
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emilie LINDH Gallagher | Nicole Gadient |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 1st Match | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 1st Match | 33% (2/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 1st Match | 43% (24/32) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 1st Match | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1st Match | 0 |
| Aces Total | 1st Match | 0 |
| DFs per game | 1st Match | 0.04 |
| DFs Total | 1st Match | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 1st Match | 169 |
| 1st Serve % | 1st Match | 74% (50/68) |
| 1st Serve W% | 1st Match | 52% (26/50) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 1st Match | 44% (8/18) |
| BPs Won% Total | 1st Match | 100% (3/3) |
| Return Pts W% | 1st Match | 38% (25/65) |
| Slam W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 1st Match | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 1st Match | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 1st Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 1st Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 1st Match | 0% (2/0) |
Emilie LINDH Gallagher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Daria Khomutsianskaya
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
8
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(3) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Francisca Jorge
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Gergana Topalova
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Maileen Nuudi
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Georgia Pedone
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Lisa Pigato
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Viktoria Morvayova
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicole Gadient Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Polina Leykina
Player
Nicole Gadient
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sebastianna Scilipoti
Player
Nicole Gadient
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 0-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Adams
Player
Nicole Gadient
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Gadient
Player
Olga Golas
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Gadient
Player
Annelin Bakker
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
12
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
57
|
1-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Karolina Kozakova
Player
Nicole Gadient
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicole Gadient
Player
Marie Villet
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gallagher Vs Gadient Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
