Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emilie LINDH Gallagher vs Elizabeth Mandlik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gallagher vs Mandlik analysis and find out who is favored!
Emilie LINDH Gallagher vs Elizabeth Mandlik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gallagher has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mandlik has won 45.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gallagher, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mandlik has won 55.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gallagher has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mandlik has saved 55.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gallagher has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mandlik winning 56.25% (W/L 36/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gallagher has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mandlik has played against players with an average rank of 189.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gallagher has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mandlik has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gallagher has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mandlik has converted 54.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gallagher 0 - 0 Mandlik
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emilie LINDH Gallagher | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 1st Match | 17% (1/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 1st Match | 27% (4/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 1st Match | 45% (66/80) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 1st Match | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1st Match | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 1st Match | 4 |
| DFs per game | 1st Match | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 1st Match | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:50:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 1st Match | 165.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 1st Match | 54% (257/472) |
| 1st Serve W% | 1st Match | 58% (150/257) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 1st Match | 41% (88/215) |
| BPs Won% Total | 1st Match | 60% (28/47) |
| Return Pts W% | 1st Match | 44% (205/461) |
| Slam W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 1st Match | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 1st Match | 17% (1/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 1st Match | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 1st Match | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 1st Match | 17% (6/1) |
Emilie LINDH Gallagher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Daria Khomutsianskaya
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
8
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(3) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Francisca Jorge
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Gergana Topalova
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Maileen Nuudi
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Georgia Pedone
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Lisa Pigato
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Viktoria Morvayova
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
31%
(
12 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jamie Loeb
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
55%
(
57 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gallagher Vs Mandlik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
