Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Hudd Gima H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Hudd Gima head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Hudd Vs Gima Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Hudd was 2023 when he won 64% of matches played on all surfaces (27/15). Gima was in the best form in 2023 when he had victories of 62% of his matches (56/34). In their last event played, Gima made the Second round at M15 Limassol, whereas Hudd played M25 Brisbane and made the Semifinals.
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
468
Rank
436
High
21
Age
Plays
Form
64% (44-25)
Career Total W/L
59% (153-107)
64% (27-15)
YTD W/L
62% (56-34)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emile Hudd | Sebastian Gima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:0 | 2:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (50/95) | 59% (46/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (38/50) | 70% (32/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (24/45) | 44% (14/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (32/78) | 35% (33/95) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Emile Hudd
Player
Sebastian Gima
53%
(
50 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emile Hudd | Sebastian Gima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (27/15) | 62% (56/34) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (60/36) | 59% (121/84) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (516/429) | 54% (1014/861) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (17/10) | 67% (14/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 62% (41/25) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 212 | 186 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 241 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:58 | 1:35:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 168.5 | 177.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1532/2374) | 55% (3099/5605) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1106/1532) | 68% (2094/3099) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (431/842) | 50% (1254/2506) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (91/209) | 43% (313/722) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (914/2385) | 44% (2606/5963) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (27/15) | 64% (52/29) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (27/42) | 62% (55/89) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 77% (10/13) | 57% (13/23) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 62% (16/26) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (28/26) | 94% (48/45) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (28/2) | 6% (48/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 26% (42/11) |
Emile Hudd Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Emile Hudd
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Emile Hudd
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
61)
56
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(5) 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Blake Mott
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Daisuke Sumizawa
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Emile Hudd
51%
(
57 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
53%
(
29 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
42 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Mitchell Harper
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Semen Pankin
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Gima Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Alexander Orlov
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Sebastian Gima
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Pierre Delage
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
4
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Sebastian Gima
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
44 of
92)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Christos Glavas
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Sebastian Gima
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
87
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Ronetto Van Tilburg
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
108)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Daniele Rapagnetta
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Hudd Vs Gima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
