Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Ulises Blanch Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ruusuvuori vs Blanch analysis and find out who is favored!
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Ulises Blanch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ruusuvuori has won 54.35% of points on his second serve, while Blanch has won 46.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ruusuvuori, in recent form, has won 53.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Blanch has won 53.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.27% and 32.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ruusuvuori has saved 60.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Blanch has saved 64.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ruusuvuori has won 54.72% of matches played (W/L 29/ 24), with Blanch winning 57.14% (W/L 20/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ruusuvuori has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 98/ 44), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 45/ 49). Blanch has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 81/ 78).
- Player level: In the last year, Ruusuvuori has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60% of matches (W/L 18/ 12), where as Blanch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ruusuvuori winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ruusuvuori winning 0 and Blanch winning 2. The last match between Ruusuvuori and Blanch was at the Samarkand Challenger, 15-05-2019, Second, Clay with Ulises Blanch getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ruusuvuori and Blanch have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ruusuvuori winning 0 times and Blanch 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ruusuvuori winning 0, and Blanch 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ruusuvuori has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.26 while Blanch has played against players with an average rank of 269.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ruusuvuori has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Blanch has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ruusuvuori has converted 36.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Blanch has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ruusuvuori 0 - 1 Blanch
68
Rank
37
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
485
Rank
236
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
62% (273-167)
Career Total W/L
53% (207-185)
61% (11-7)
YTD W/L
83% (5-1)
$2,433,160
Career Prize Money
$54,150
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ruusuvuori VS Blanch H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Emil Ruusuvuori | Ulises Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:57:35 | 0:57:35 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (35/59) | 52% (24/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (24/35) | 88% (21/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (10/24) | 73% (16/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 20% (9/46) | 42% (25/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ruusuvuori VS Blanch H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Ulises Blanch
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emil Ruusuvuori | Ulises Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (11/7) | 83% (5/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (26/19) | 67% (10/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (237/218) | 52% (76/70) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 83% (5/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 87 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:35 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.11 | 262 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (880/1432) | 57% (264/464) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (634/880) | 73% (192/264) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (302/552) | 47% (93/200) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (46/130) | 33% (21/63) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (556/1456) | 41% (199/490) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (10/15) | 83% (5/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 50% (2/1) |
Emil Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve %
71%
(
10 of
14)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Christopher O'Connell
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
13
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Ugo Humbert
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
76%
(
66 of
87)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
36 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Luca Van Assche
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ulises Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Matej Dodig
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
30 of
34)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
81
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Luca Castagnola
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Louis Dussin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
John Sperle
52%
(
59 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
7
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
4
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Benjamin Pietri
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Ulises Blanch
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
12
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxence Beauge
Player
Ulises Blanch
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Ulises Blanch
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
11
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(3) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Izan Almazan Valiente
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
2
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darian King
Player
Ulises Blanch
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ruusuvuori Vs Blanch Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
