A. Kovacevic
To Win
E. Ruusuvuori
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L L W LForm
L W W W L L W W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Ruusuvuori winning 2 and Prihodko winning 1. The last match between Ruusuvuori and Prihodko was at the Cherbourg Challenger, 11-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: I.hard, with Emil Ruusuvuori getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Emil Ruusuvuori | 1 |
Oleg Prihodko | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Cherbourg Challenger(11-03-2025)
Ruusuvuori | Stats | Prihodko |
---|---|---|
40% (6-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (12-15) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
254 | Ranking | 325 |
37 | Highest Rank | 309 |
26 | Age | 27 |
R | Plays | R |
10 | Titles | 6 |
61% (285-186) | Career Total W/L | 59% (357-253) |
$2,614,675 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 1-6 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
13 | Games Won | 13 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:21:25 | Average Match Time | 1:21:25 |
57% (46/81) | 1st Serve % | 68% (50/73) |
67% (31/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (35/50) |
54% (19/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (11/23) |
75% (3/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
37% (27/73) | Return Points Win % | 38% (31/81) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Recent data regarding second serve performance reveal that Ruusuvuori has secured 42.93% of points on their second serve in the past six months, whereas Prihodko has outperformed with a 48.85% success rate. This performance metric shows a strong correlation with accurately predicting match outcomes. Additionally, when examining return game stats from the same period, Ruusuvuori has won 46.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Prihodko lags slightly behind at 44.87%.
Diving into their return stats on first serve points, Ruusuvuori maintains an edge by winning 28.15% of their matches compared to Prihodko's 24.95%. These figures are crucial as they help indicate which player might be favored in this head-to-head matchup. Analyzing how players handle pressure, Ruusuvuori has a higher breakpoint save percentage at 63.49% versus Prihodko’s 57.78%, a stat useful for in-game betting predictions.
Looking at the overall performance over the last year, Prihodko exhibits a significantly higher match win rate, winning 74.36% (W/L 58/20), in contrast to Ruusuvuori's 39.13% (W/L 9/14). Surface preference also plays a role; Ruusuvuori excels on Indoor Hard courts with a winning percentage of 68% (W/L 100/46), while Prihodko's preference lies with Clay, boasting a 60% win rate (W/L 281/191).
In terms of playing experience, Ruusuvuori has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K over the last year, achieving a 36.36% win rate (W/L 4/7), whereas Prihodko's performance in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments is substantially better at 79.31% (W/L 46/12). Moreover, the average ranking of Ruusuvuori's opponents is higher at 138.96 compared to Prihodko's 406.77, reflecting differing levels of competition.
Examining deciding set performance highlights Ruusuvuori's win rate of 40% over the past year, whereas Prihodko has a more favorable rate of 57% in all matches. Finally, their breakpoint conversion rates further illuminate their abilities: Ruusuvuori has converted 29.73% of breakpoint opportunities compared to Prihodko's slightly superior rate of 31.29%.
Considering these comprehensive statistics, Prihodko appears to have an edge in this upcoming match. Their superior win rates across various metrics, coupled with a consistent track record in matches, set them up as the likely victor.
Ruusuvuori vs Prihodko Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jerome Kym
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Luka Mikrut
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ilia Simakin
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrew Paulson
Player
Oleg Prihodko
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Fabio Fognini
Player
Oleg Prihodko
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Gianluca Mager
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hynek Barton
Player
Oleg Prihodko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
79)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Oleg Prihodko
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
54%
(
72 of
134)
1st Serve %
69%
(
87 of
126)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
58 of
87)
55%
(
34 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
37%
(
50 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
131
Total Points Won
129
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (285/186) | Win/Loss | 59% (357/253) |
58% (642/470) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (798/586) |
53% (5660/4980) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6938/6027) |
65% (120/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (52/44) |
47% (48/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (286/196) |
67% (103/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (19/13) |
48% (14/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
1734 | Aces Total | 1498 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
1382 | Total Double Faults | 908 |
1:34:13 | Average Match Time | 1:14:25 |
358.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 451.63 |
65% (20114/31129) | 1st Serve % | 65% (19283/29772) |
71% (14255/20114) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12919/19283) |
51% (5583/11015) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5110/10489) |
42% (1309/3138) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1467/3339) |
40% (12797/31971) | Return Points Win % | 42% (12914/30951) |
39% (11/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
51% (28/27) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
67% (14/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
57% (86/64) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
63% (72/43) | Challenger W/L | 48% (47/50) |
73% (74/28) | Futures W/L | 61% (310/202) |
62% (270/435) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (354/603) |
39% (11/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
53% (81/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (79/152) |
56% (75/133) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (83/170) |
89% (286/254) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (359/315) |
11% (286/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (359/44) |
16% (183/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (250/41) |