Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ema Burgic Bucko vs Quirine Lemoine Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bucko vs Lemoine analysis and find out who is favored!
Ema Burgic Bucko vs Quirine Lemoine Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bucko has won 41.18% of points on his second serve, while Lemoine has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bucko, in recent form, has won 59.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lemoine has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.51% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bucko has saved 47.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lemoine has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bucko has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 2/ 1), with Lemoine winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bucko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 50/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Lemoine has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 175/ 94), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bucko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1), where as Lemoine has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bucko winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bucko winning 2 and Lemoine winning 0. The last match between Bucko and Lemoine was at the Orlando, 15-03-2016, First, Clay with Ema Burgic Bucko getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bucko and Lemoine have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bucko winning 0 times and Lemoine 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bucko winning 0, and Lemoine 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bucko has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.33 while Lemoine has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bucko has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lemoine has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bucko has converted 56.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lemoine has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bucko 1 - 0 Lemoine
836
Rank
466
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
821
Rank
137
High
32
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
62% (133-83)
Career Total W/L
63% (306-180)
67% (2-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$73,824
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ema Burgic Bucko | Quirine Lemoine |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:57:0 | 0:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (30/44) | 60% (24/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (25/30) | 42% (10/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (6/14) | 31% (5/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (25/40) | 30% (13/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Quirine Lemoine
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ema Burgic Bucko | Quirine Lemoine |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (44/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.64 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:20 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (95/163) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (54/95) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (28/68) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 56% (9/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (73/155) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Ema Burgic Bucko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Kolodynska
Player
Ema Burgic Bucko
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
15
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Tiffany William
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-4 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Oleksandra Andrieieva
Player
Ema Burgic Bucko
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
82 of
109)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Yana Morderger
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Doga Selen Takunyaci
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiya Shoshyna
Player
Ema Burgic Bucko
91%
(
49 of
54)
1st Serve %
88%
(
51 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Elina Nepliy
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Karoline Kurz
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Quirine Lemoine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Quirine Lemoine
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Erica Oosterhout
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Kurumi Nara
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Quirine Lemoine
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maileen Nuudi
Player
Quirine Lemoine
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Quirine Lemoine
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Quirine Lemoine
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Quirine Lemoine
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Quirine Lemoine
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bucko Vs Lemoine Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
