E. Jacquemot
To Win
M. Sakkari
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L W LForm
W W W W L L L W W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Jacquemot winning 1 and Starodubtseva winning 2. The last match between Jacquemot and Starodubtseva was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 22-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Yuliia Starodubtseva getting the victory 7-6(5) 2-6 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Elsa Jacquemot | 0 |
Yuliia Starodubtseva | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(22-04-2025)
Jacquemot | Stats | Starodubtseva |
---|---|---|
59% (24-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (10-16) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
139 | Ranking | 86 |
137 | Highest Rank | 79 |
22 | Age | 25 |
- | Plays | - |
2 | Titles | 4 |
53% (178-158) | Career Total W/L | 60% (123-81) |
$293,293 | Career Prize Money | $637,422 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(5) 2-6 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
72%
(
91 of
127)
1st Serve %
63%
(
75 of
119)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
58 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
118
Total Points Won
128
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
1 | Sets Won | 2 |
17 | Games Won | 16 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
9 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
3:17:57 | Average Match Time | 3:17:57 |
63% (75/119) | 1st Serve % | 72% (91/127) |
63% (47/75) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (47/91) |
52% (23/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (22/36) |
40% (6/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (5/17) |
46% (58/127) | Return Points Win % | 41% (49/119) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
As we delve into the world of tennis statistics, what revelations can we gather regarding the upcoming match between Jacquemot and Starodubtseva? For starters, the performance of each player on their second serve could hold some intriguing insights. In the past six months, Jacquemot has secured 40.64% of points on their second serve, while Starodubtseva has had a slight edge with 45.23%. Could this subtle difference be a predictor of the match outcome?
Exploring return game statistics further enhances our analysis. Jacquemot, in a recent form, has impressively won 53.77% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Starodubtseva has captured 50.64%. Interestingly, when scrutinizing first serve returns, Jacquemot falls behind with a 27.9% success rate compared to Starodubtseva’s 34.1%. These figures are noteworthy as they might significantly influence the prediction of a favored contender in head-to-head encounters.
How do these players perform under pressure, specifically when faced with break points? Jacquemot has managed to save 46.43% of breakpoints in recent months, with Starodubtseva slightly surpassing this with 47.85%. This scenario is a crucial factor for crafting in-game betting strategies. Over the past year, Jacquemot has maintained a win rate of 52.5%, securing victories in 42 out of 80 matches. Starodubtseva, closely aligned, has won 53.85% of their matches, showing a win-loss ratio of 35/30. Could these figures be pivotal in predicting the winner of this face-off?
The preferred playing surfaces of these competitors hand us more clues. Jacquemot’s forte lies in indoor hard courts, with a 58% win rate, contrasting starkly with a 46% win rate on grass. Starodubtseva, conversely, thrives on grass with a 71% win rate, and exhibits a lower win rate of 56% on clay. Do these surface preferences have implications for their upcoming clash?
The caliber of opponents confronted also plays a role in assessing player potential. Jacquemot has faced competitors with an average ranking of 200.69 over the past year. In comparison, Starodubtseva has battled players with a higher average rank of 171.71. Moreover, if the match were to progress into a deciding set, Starodubtseva seems to hold an upper hand, having emerged victorious in 50% of such scenarios, compared to Jacquemot’s 36% success rate.
Considering the trajectory of their careers, Jacquemot has dominated the Challengers/ITF circuit, winning a commendable 57.38% of matches in these tournaments which are above the $10K mark. In contrast, Starodubtseva trails with a 47.06% win rate in similar competitions. Lastly, the conversion of breakpoint opportunities further provides a lens into their potential success. Jacquemot capitalizes on 34.96% of these chances, whereas Starodubtseva excels with a 43.64% conversion rate.
If one were to make a prediction based on the amalgamation of these statistics, Starodubtseva emerges as a slight favorite to win, given her edge in several key performance metrics. However, tennis remains an unpredictable sport, where the final outcome can defy expectation, and only time will reveal the true victor of this engaging match-up.
Jacquemot vs Starodubtseva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Anna Blinkova
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Suzan Lamens
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Katie Boulter
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Sonay Kartal
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
34
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Yue Yuan
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
23%
(
7 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Sara Bejlek
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
82%
(
50 of
61)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Julie Belgraver
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sara Bejlek
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Tamara Zidansek
71%
(
70 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
118)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
62 of
118)
124
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
53% (178/158) | Win/Loss | 60% (123/81) |
53% (420/368) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (265/200) |
51% (3804/3599) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2232/1927) |
53% (30/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (58/35) |
50% (71/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (53/41) |
57% (71/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) |
46% (6/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) |
0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
1435 | Aces Total | 154 |
0.5 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
1801 | Total Double Faults | 340 |
1:47:46 | Average Match Time | 1:26:54 |
326.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 314.98 |
59% (14266/24305) | 1st Serve % | 64% (7093/11149) |
66% (9395/14266) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (4221/7093) |
42% (4174/10039) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1911/4056) |
47% (1419/3030) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (747/1488) |
45% (11195/24672) | Return Points Win % | 47% (5322/11232) |
38% (10/16) | Slam W/L | 68% (15/7) |
29% (2/5) | Masters W/L | 65% (15/8) |
33% (9/18) | Main Tour W/L | 35% (8/15) |
57% (150/113) | Challenger W/L | 65% (65/35) |
54% (7/6) | Futures W/L | 56% (20/16) |
52% (174/332) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (121/202) |
49% (39/79) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (13/31) |
43% (52/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (38/59) |
79% (183/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (114/102) |
21% (183/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (114/12) |
21% (152/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (90/21) |