Elsa Jacquemot vs Suzan Lamens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W L L
Form
L L W L L L W W L LHead-2-Head: Jacquemot 1 - 0 Lamens
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jacquemot winning 2 and Lamens winning 0. The last match between Jacquemot and Lamens was at the Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg, 17-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Elsa Jacquemot getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Elsa Jacquemot | 1 |
| Suzan Lamens | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg(17-05-2025)
Elsa Jacquemot
Suzan Lamens
7
5
7
5
| Jacquemot | Stats | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (28-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (18-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 113 | Ranking | 70 |
| 113 | Highest Rank | 64 |
| 22 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 8 |
| 53% (182-162) | Career Total W/L | 58% (303-223) |
| $461,293 | Career Prize Money | $447,968 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Humbert VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Suzan Lamens
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:46:25 | Average Match Time | 1:46:25 |
| 54% (37/68) | 1st Serve % | 57% (39/68) |
| 70% (26/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (22/39) |
| 52% (16/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 47% (32/68) | Return Points Win % | 38% (26/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jacquemot vs Lamens Match Preview :
- Jacquemot has a slight edge in recent second serve performance, winning 41.77% of points compared to Lamens' 39.16%. Could this factor be crucial in determining the winner?
- When it comes to returning second serves, Jacquemot also leads, taking 53.06% of their opponent's points, while Lamens follows with 50%. Does this indicate a significant advantage for Jacquemot?
- Conversely, Lamens showcases a better first serve return rate at 31.51% against Jacquemot's 29.36%—a critical stat for assessing chances in tougher serving games.
- Lamens narrowly surpasses Jacquemot in breakpoint saving, with 49.14% compared to 47.92%. Is this a game-changer in pressure situations?
- Throughout the past year, Lamens has a higher win percentage of 55.88% in match outcomes, while Jacquemot has secured 52.44% of their matches.
- Looking at surface preferences, Jacquemot excels on indoor hard courts, winning 58% of matches, and Lamens favors clay courts, winning 61%. Will the playing surface affect their performance in this matchup?
- Jacquemot plays primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 58.06% of these games, while Lamens plays on the Main Tour, boasting a 61.76% win rate. Does the difference in competition level provide Lamens a preparedness advantage?
- In terms of opponent quality, Lamens typically faces more challenging opponents, with an average opponent rank of 120.88, as opposed to Jacquemot's, ranked at 198.7.
- For deciding sets, Lamens proves stronger, winning 56% of encounters, while Jacquemot has a lower success rate of 37%. Could this give Lamens an edge if the match goes the distance?
- Breakpoint conversion is another area where Jacquemot holds a lead, converting 38.22% of chances, compared to Lamens' 34.3%. How crucial could this be in crucial games?
Editorial Prediction (May 17, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Jacquemot and Lamens presents a fascinating comparison of strengths and weaknesses. Jacquemot's robust second serve performance and superior breaking capabilities suggest they might have a technical advantage.
However, Lamens' experience on the Main Tour and familiarity with higher-ranked challengers could offer a psychological and strategic edge. Her impressive track record in deciding sets further bolsters her prospects if the match extends into a final set.
The playing surface may also favor one player over the other, depending on where they excel. While Jacquemot dominates indoor hard courts, Lamens shines on clay, an important factor if applicable.
From a comprehensive analysis of key statistics and player patterns, Lamens appears to have a slight upper hand overall due to her experience and ability to perform under pressure, positioning her as the likely victor in this encounter.
Jacquemot vs Lamens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Elsa Jacquemot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
64%
(
84 of
131)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
122)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
53 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
126
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Sijia Wei
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Eva Vedder
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Alycia Parks
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
96
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Maria Sakkari
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Suzan Lamens
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Suzan Lamens
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Ann Li
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
48%
(
54 of
113)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Yanina Wickmayer
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Suzan Lamens
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Suzan Lamens
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Suzan Lamens
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Renata Zarazua
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (182/162) | Win/Loss | 58% (303/223) |
| 53% (432/377) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (672/533) |
| 51% (3912/3688) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5806/5175) |
| 53% (30/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (80/67) |
| 50% (74/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (188/124) |
| 57% (71/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (32/24) |
| 44% (7/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1458 | Aces Total | 859 |
| 0.49 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.47 |
| 1831 | Total Double Faults | 2489 |
| 1:47:57 | Average Match Time | 1:29:40 |
| 326.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 428.9 |
| 59% (14658/24953) | 1st Serve % | 59% (18625/31623) |
| 66% (9649/14658) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11488/18578) |
| 42% (4296/10295) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (5574/13070) |
| 47% (1458/3112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2135/4215) |
| 45% (11488/25313) | Return Points Win % | 48% (15236/31806) |
| 41% (12/17) | Slam W/L | 23% (3/10) |
| 29% (2/5) | Masters W/L | 42% (5/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 73% (11/4) |
| 32% (9/19) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (29/26) |
| 57% (152/115) | Challenger W/L | 62% (166/101) |
| 54% (7/6) | Futures W/L | 54% (89/75) |
| 52% (178/340) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (300/522) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (40/82) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (50/100) |
| 42% (53/126) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (87/155) |
| 79% (189/149) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (278/251) |
| 21% (189/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (278/27) |
| 21% (154/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (248/52) |
Jacquemot vs. Lamens Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
