F. Coria
To Win
E. Moller
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L L L W LForm
L W W L L W W W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Moller winning 1 and Vacherot winning 2. The last match between Moller and Vacherot was at the Pune Challenger, 17-02-2025, First, Hard with Valentin Vacherot getting the victory 5-7 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Elmer Moller | 0 |
Valentin Vacherot | 1 |
Pune Challenger(17-02-2025)
25 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 6-2 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Elmer Moller
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Insights on the Upcoming Tennis Match:
In the realm of second serve performance, recent results from the past six months reveal that Moller has managed to secure victory in 48.21% of points on their second serve. Conversely, Vacherot has exhibited a slightly better performance with a winning rate of 48.36%. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Turning our attention to the return game statistics, Moller's recent form demonstrates an ability to triumph in 56.71% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other side of the court, Vacherot possesses a success rate of 52.53% in the same category. When it comes to first serve returns, the numbers stand at 36.13% for Moller and 32.45% for Vacherot. This data carries significant weight in determining who is favored in this head-to-head (H2H) encounter.
An analysis of how players perform under pressure reveals that Moller has skillfully saved 60.34% of breakpoints in recent matches. In comparison, Vacherot has proven even more adept by rescuing a remarkable 67.12% of these pivotal moments. This particular statistic serves as a valuable tool for in-game betting predictions.
Examining the overall performance of the two competitors, Moller holds an impressive track record with a 67.82% success rate in matches played over the past year (W/L: 59/28). Meanwhile, Vacherot boasts a commendable winning rate of 64.44% (W/L: 29/16). Taking these figures into account provides us with a comprehensive overview for predicting the expected outcome in this match-up.
Considering the playing surface, Moller enjoys their greatest success on clay courts, conquering 71% of matches played on this terrain (W/L: 97/40). Conversely, their performance on hard courts dips slightly with a win percentage of 59% (W/L: 37/26). For Vacherot, hard courts are their stronghold, as they have triumphed in 72% of matches played on this surface (W/L: 114/44). Conversely, their performances on grass courts have been less fruitful, resulting in a win percentage of 0% (W/L: 0/1).
Delving into player levels, it becomes evident that Moller has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10K, securing victory in 65% of their matches (W/L: 39/21). In contrast, Vacherot has participated in a similar caliber of events, winning an impressive 73.91% of matches (W/L: 17/6). As we compare these statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative level of competition each player has encountered.
Examining opponent quality statistics reveals that over the past year, Moller has faced opponents with an average ranking of 362.7. In contrast, Vacherot's opponents have possessed an average ranking of 234.91.
When contemplating live predictions and betting scenarios during crucial deciding sets, it is worth noting that Moller has emerged victorious in 40% of deciding sets played in the last year. Vacherot, on the other hand, has achieved success in 63% of all matches played on the tour.
Informative insights can also be derived from current event head-to-head (H2H) statistics. While past player performance possesses considerable value in predicting tennis matches, when an event is underway, current event statistics should also be considered to gauge the form of the players. For specific details regarding the current event, kindly refer to the section below (if the players have already competed in the ongoing event). Additionally, it is essential to consider that certain players may exhibit enhanced performance levels at specific events, adding another layer of complexity when determining the likely outcome.
An analysis of break point conversion percentages uncovers that Moller has successfully converted 48.4% of their opportunities, while Vacherot has achieved a conversion rate of 45.31% when attempting to break their opponent's serve. This particular statistic carries significant weight in terms of in-game live betting tips, especially when either player finds themselves facing a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in predictive models for tennis matches, the following article is a worthwhile resource to explore (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts).
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Miguel Damas
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
109)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
49 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Elmer Moller
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
26 of
63)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Elmer Moller
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Elias Ymer
Player
Elmer Moller
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
38%
(
26 of
68)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Rubber 1 | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Elmer Moller
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Constant Lestienne
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
12 of
48)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Stefan Kozlov
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Valentin Vacherot
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Valentin Vacherot
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Raul Brancaccio
71%
(
74 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
29 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Michiel De Krom
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
48
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Alexander Donski
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Holt
Player
Valentin Vacherot
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Valentin Vacherot
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
6
Aces
17
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Masamichi Imamura
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Elmer Moller
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Valentin Vacherot
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
78 of
116)
5
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
78)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Moller