Elmer Moller vs Kimmer Coppejans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W L L L L
Form
W L W W W W W W W LH2H: Moller 1 - 1 Coppejans
They have played 5 sets in total, with Moller winning 2 and Coppejans winning 3. The last match between Moller and Coppejans was at the French Open - Paris, 21-05-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Clay, with Elmer Moller getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Elmer Moller | 1 |
| Kimmer Coppejans | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(21-05-2025)
Elmer Moller
Kimmer Coppejans
4
6
6
1
6
2
| Moller | Stats | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (18-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (34-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 110 | Ranking | 237 |
| 108 | Highest Rank | 97 |
| 21 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 17 |
| 66% (170-88) | Career Total W/L | 59% (479-335) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $337,830 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Popyrin VS Vukic PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Portero VS Etcheverry PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Elmer Moller
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 24 | Games Won | 21 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:39:53 | Average Match Time | 1:39:53 |
| 63% (94/150) | 1st Serve % | 60% (82/136) |
| 60% (56/94) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (52/82) |
| 54% (30/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (24/54) |
| 50% (9/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (7/14) |
| 44% (60/136) | Return Points Win % | 43% (64/150) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Moller vs Coppejans Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Moller has secured 42.55% of points on their second serve, while Coppejans follows closely with 42.52%. What does this minor difference indicate? It shows both players have similar reliability on their second serves in recent form.
- Return Game Strengths: Moller has claimed 48.4% of points on their opponent's second serve, slightly superior to Coppejans, who has won 45.51%. However, for first serve returns, Coppejans leads with 29.77% compared to Moller's 29.3%. Do these differences foreshadow the overall favorite? Marginally in favor of Moller for second serve returns.
- Pressure Performance: In terms of saving breakpoints, Moller edges Coppejans, securing 55.23% compared to 52.32% for Coppejans.
- Match Performance: Although Moller has a win rate of 65.88% over the last year, Coppejans leads with 73.61%. Does this suggest an upper hand for Coppejans? Certainly in recent match outcomes.
- Preferred Surfaces: Moller's strongest career performance is on clay with a 71% win rate, whereas Coppejans excels on hard courts with a 62% win rate. Are the surface preferences a crucial factor? They might influence play depending on the match surface.
- Event Level Experience: Both Moller and Coppejans have comparable win rates at Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with Moller slightly trailing at 64.18% compared to Coppejans's 64.29%.
- Direct Face-offs: In their only previous encounter, Coppejans triumphed over Moller in two straight sets on clay at the Murcia Challenger.
- Deciding Set Performance: Over the last year, Coppejans has a more favorable deciding set win rate of 58% compared to Moller's 42%.
- Break Point Conversion: Coppejans has demonstrated better efficiency recently, converting 40.34% of break points versus Moller's 33.55%.
- Opponent Quality: Moller has faced stronger competition on average, going up against opponents ranked 307.11 compared to Coppejans's 345.38.
- Tiebreaks: In direct matches, both players have not played any tiebreaks against each other, leaving this as an unpredictable factor.
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the available statistics, Coppejans shows a slight advantage in first serve returns and deciding set scenarios. Coupled with a higher overall win percentage in the last year, Coppejans appears to be in a strong position.
Although Moller has a marginal edge in saving breakpoints and competing against stronger opponents, these factors do not significantly outweigh Coppejans's consistent performance trends.
Considering the head-to-head record, recent form, and playing surface, Coppejans is likely to secure another victory in the upcoming match against Moller.
Moller vs Coppejans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Elmer Moller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Elmer Moller
57%
(
72 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
121)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
57%
(
31 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
49 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
135
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Elmer Moller
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Facundo Bagnis
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Elmer Moller
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Noel Larwig
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Herman Hoeyeraal
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Alex Barrena
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
56%
(
64 of
115)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dan Added
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
25 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Maxence Beauge
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Arthur Reymond
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (170/88) | Win/Loss | 59% (479/335) |
| 64% (376/210) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1088/851) |
| 56% (3065/2386) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9568/8588) |
| 57% (37/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (140/87) |
| 70% (112/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (319/203) |
| 66% (21/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 32% (17/36) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 541 | Aces Total | 2183 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 896 | Total Double Faults | 1849 |
| 1:31:42 | Average Match Time | 1:29:13 |
| 400.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 495.53 |
| 63% (10016/15910) | 1st Serve % | 64% (31994/49662) |
| 67% (6693/10016) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (21472/31994) |
| 47% (2783/5894) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (8602/17668) |
| 47% (974/2055) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (2413/5545) |
| 45% (7494/16484) | Return Points Win % | 42% (21296/50755) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 52% (35/32) |
| 67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 63% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 28% (11/29) |
| 63% (63/37) | Challenger W/L | 57% (296/223) |
| 69% (98/44) | Futures W/L | 75% (134/44) |
| 67% (168/251) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (472/800) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 51% (34/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (119/218) |
| 50% (37/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (170/300) |
| 88% (170/149) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (446/374) |
| 12% (170/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (446/71) |
| 24% (88/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (368/104) |
Moller vs. Coppejans Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
