Ella Seidel vs Celine Naef Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W L W W L W L W L
Form
L W W W W L W W W LH2H: Seidel 1 - 2 Naef
They have played 7 sets in total, with Seidel winning 3 and Naef winning 4. The last match between Seidel and Naef was at the W75 Trnava, 28-02-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Ella Seidel | 1 |
Celine Naef | 2 |
W75 Trnava(28-02-2025)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kalinskaya VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
23 Mar 2025 / Third
Ruud VS Tabilo PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
23 Mar 2025 / Third
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 4-6 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Ella Seidel
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
6-2 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Ella Seidel
Player
Celine Naef
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
6-3 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Ella Seidel
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ella Seidel vs Celine Naef Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ella Seidel 1 - 2 Celine Naef
You know tennis matches, right? They're like a game of chess played with rackets where the rules of probability have a field day over the court. Let's dive into this exhilarating upcoming encounter between Seidel and Naef, who are seeking victory like a squirrel chasing the last nut before winter's onslaught.
Seidel's second serve has been a bit like trying to find the matching pair of socks after laundry day—only managing to win 41.17% in recent matches, slightly behind Naef's dazzling and slightly superior 41.68%. When it comes to returning, Seidel's been nailing 52.01% of opponents' second serve points, but watch out, Naef’s stats bring second serve returns that stick like Velcro, scoring a 45.69%. For first serve returns, Naef sneaks ahead with 30.49%, just edging past Seidel at 29.48%.
Both players have the finesse of a magician pulling rabbits from hats when the pressure's on. Seidel's saved breakpoints 54.22% of the time, while Naef’s been smoothing out the wrinkles in their game with a 45.78% survival rate. In rain or sunshine, it seems both players have griped more about their performances on grass—Seidel's avoided the greenery like a cat avoiding a full bath, with a 0% win rate, while Naef has scraped through, managing a 50% victory dance.
When it comes to Challenger/ITF forums of more than $10k tournaments, Naef wins in the glitz and glamour department, securing 65.45% of triumphs compared to Seidel's substantial yet slightly behind 61.36%. The head-to-head between these two serves up its own narrative, with each having come out tops in one match apiece. Seidel, a wiz in I.hard terrains, snag previously won their last I.hard dance-off against Naef with a confident 6-2 6-4.
There’s a tinge of irony in their deciding sets: mirroring two synchronized swimmers who forgot choreography, not a single deciding set between them has occurred! Over the 12-month horizon, Naef's been sparring with players averaging an intimidating rank of 216.82, comfortably ahead of Seidel's modest, yet commendable average of opponents with a rank of 237. When the going gets tough in deciding sets, Naef's aced it 56% of the time compared to Seidel's 41%.
Breakpoints are like opening spoilers to a movie—who could ignore them? Naef's been the spoiler master, converting 37.7% with finesse, while Seidel's hustled a 32.93% in breakpoint opportunities. Despite Naef’s past and present aggregates, their overall slightly better stats suggest Naef could dance off with the trophy. Ladies and gentlemen, hold onto your hats and popcorn—it promises to be an electrifying match!
Ella Seidel Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Ella Seidel
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ella Seidel
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Ella Seidel
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ella Seidel
Player
Francisca Jorge
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Ella Seidel
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ella Seidel
Player
Ana Konjuh
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
0
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ella Seidel
Player
Sayaka Ishii
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Ella Seidel
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
11 of
22)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
39
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ella Seidel
Player
Tereza Valentova
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ella Seidel
Player
Anastasiia Sobolieva
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Ella Seidel
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Destanee Aiava
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Linda Klimovicova
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Lian Tran
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Weronika Ewald
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Celine Naef
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Other Predictions
- Loading news...