M. Gatell
To Win
E. Yaneva
To Win
Elizara Yaneva vs Jasmijn Gimbrere Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W W
Form
W L W L W W L W L LHead-to-head: Yaneva 3 - 0 Gimbrere
They have played 7 sets in total, with Yaneva winning 6 and Gimbrere winning 1. The last match between Yaneva and Gimbrere was at the W15 Manacor, 20-02-2025, Second, Hard with Elizara Yaneva getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
W15 Manacor(20-02-2025)
6
2
6
2
Upcoming Match
- / Q2 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Dart VS Saville PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 2-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats
3
H2H Matches
0
6
Sets Won
1
38
Games Won
21
2
Aces (Total)
2
6
Total Double Faults
11
1:37:42
Average Match Time
1:37:42
56% (106/189)
1st Serve %
60% (118/196)
71% (75/106)
1st Serve Win %
53% (63/118)
45% (37/83)
2nd Serve Win %
35% (27/78)
63% (17/27)
Break Points Won % (Total)
39% (9/23)
54% (106/196)
Return Points Win %
41% (77/189)
100% (3/3)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/3)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Elizara Yaneva vs Jasmijn Gimbrere Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Elizara Yaneva 3 - 0 Jasmijn Gimbrere
- In recent performance, Yaneva and Gimbrere's second serve results have differed slightly, with Yaneva winning 48.53% of points and Gimbrere winning 46.11%. This statistic has a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- Examining their return game statistics in recent matches, Yaneva has shown superiority by winning 59.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gimbrere has achieved 58.14%. When it comes to first serve returns, Yaneva has a success rate of 44.19%, compared to Gimbrere's 40.86%. These figures greatly influence the favorability of the head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure, Yaneva has demonstrated great resilience by saving 61.94% of breakpoints in recent matches, whereas Gimbrere has saved 55.6%. This valuable statistic provides insights for in-game betting predictions.
- An overview of their performances over the past year reveals that Yaneva has won 61.11% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 11/7. On the other hand, Gimbrere has achieved a 60% win rate, with a win-loss record of 36/24. Considering these results, we can form an overall prediction for their head-to-head matchup.
- When considering the players' performance on different surfaces, Yaneva has excelled on the hardcourt, winning 71% of matches played, while struggling on clay with a win rate of only 25%. Conversely, Gimbrere has shown strength on hardcourt, winning 57% of matches, and a weakness on grass, with a win rate of 0%. Surface preference is an important aspect to consider in making predictions.
- An analysis of their respective player levels in the past year indicates that Yaneva has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, winning 64.71% of matches. In contrast, Gimbrere has participated in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a prize exceeding $10K, securing a 57.69% win rate. When comparing the stats of players at different event levels, it remains relative to the level at which they have been competing.
- Yaneva and Gimbrere have crossed paths twice in previous matches, resulting in Yaneva claiming victory on both occasions. With a total of five sets played, Yaneva has won four sets, while Gimbrere has only won one. Their most recent encounter took place at the W15 Manacor on 14-02-2025, during the quarterfinals, where Yaneva triumphed with a score of 2-6 6-2 6-4.
- On average, their head-to-head matches have lasted for approximately 1 hour, 51 minutes, and 18 seconds.
- In matches with a deciding set, Yaneva and Gimbrere have faced each other once. Yaneva emerged victorious on that occasion, while Gimbrere failed to secure a win in this scenario. This information proves valuable for predicting the outcome if the current match goes the distance.
- Not a single tiebreak has occurred in their head-to-head matches, with both players yet to claim a victory in this extreme pressure situation.
- Examining the quality of their opponents in the past 12 months reveals that Yaneva has faced players with an average rank of 484.94, whereas Gimbrere has competed against opponents with an average rank of 436.62.
- When it comes to deciding sets, Yaneva has achieved a remarkable 71% victory rate over the past 12 months. In contrast, Gimbrere has won 55% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. These statistics are particularly useful for live predictions and betting.
- Past player performances provide useful insights for predicting tennis matches. However, once an event is underway, it is essential to consider current event statistics to determine the form of the players. For an indication of the in-form player, please refer to the section below (Event Statistics) if they have already competed in this current event. Moreover, it is worth noting that certain players exhibit better performances at specific events, and this should be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
- In recent form, Yaneva has successfully converted 48.94% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Gimbrere has achieved a conversion rate of 45.08% when it comes to breaking their opponents' serve. These statistics provide valuable insights for in-game live betting tips when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it may be more suitable for avid statistics enthusiasts.
Elizara Yaneva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Britt Du Pree
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
12
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Alice Robbe
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Irina Fetecau
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Lea Nilsson
53%
(
54 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve %
50%
(
7 of
14)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
26
Total Points Won
13
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Johanne Svendsen
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Lavinia Tanasie
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jasmijn Gimbrere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Daley
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
48%
(
39 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Sara Dols
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
79%
(
119 of
150)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
70 of
119)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
67 of
150)
133
Total Points Won
126
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Alicia Herrero Linana
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
79
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Ayana Akli
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (19/14)
Win/Loss
54% (146/123)
53% (39/34)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (327/290)
52% (326/307)
Games Win/Loss
52% (2974/2760)
78% (14/4)
Hard Win/Loss
56% (50/40)
31% (4/9)
Clay Win/Loss
54% (65/56)
50% (1/1)
Indoor Hard W/L
55% (31/25)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/2)
0.13
Aces Per Game
0.12
41
Aces Total
337
0.41
Double Faults Per Game
0.31
125
Total Double Faults
880
1:34:3
Average Match Time
1:23:10
518.33
Average Opponent Rank
487.68
56% (1183/2121)
1st Serve %
61% (8872/14468)
62% (728/1183)
1st Serve Win %
60% (5315/8872)
43% (409/946)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (2405/5596)
49% (135/274)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (941/1991)
48% (984/2066)
Return Points Win %
47% (6839/14489)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
29% (2/5)
Challenger W/L
52% (81/76)
65% (17/9)
Futures W/L
59% (65/45)
53% (16/30)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
54% (143/265)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/4)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
45% (19/42)
60% (6/10)
Deciding Set Win %
53% (44/83)
78% (18/14)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (136/118)
22% (18/4)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (136/18)
33% (15/5)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (133/27)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
