Elizabeth Mandlik vs Stefania Rogozinska Dzik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W W L L
Form
L W L W L W W W W LHead-to-head: Mandlik 1 - 0 Dzik
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mandlik winning 2 and Dzik winning 0. The last match between Mandlik and Dzik was at the W75 Templeton, 26-09-2024, Second, Hard with Elizabeth Mandlik getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
W75 Templeton(26-09-2024)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gauff VS Kenin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
20 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Muchova VS Azarenka PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
0
0
Aces (Total)
0
1
Total Double Faults
3
1:2:0
Average Match Time
1:2:0
68% (21/31)
1st Serve %
68% (25/37)
86% (18/21)
1st Serve Win %
28% (7/25)
60% (6/10)
2nd Serve Win %
17% (2/12)
100% (6/6)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
76% (28/37)
Return Points Win %
23% (7/31)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Alicia Herrero Linana
49%
(
47 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
5
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Victoria Hu
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Aliona Bolsova
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
82%
(
72 of
88)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
102)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
86
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Sophie Chang
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Vivian Wolff
50%
(
5 of
10)
1st Serve %
47%
(
9 of
19)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
20
Total Points Won
9
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Victoria Osuigwe
88%
(
64 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
60 of
79)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Jenna Defalco
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
20)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
59%
(
23 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
81%
(
67 of
83)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Lilian Poling
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stephanie Judith Visscher
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
Player
Emma Van Poppel
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Samson
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
56% (175/136)
Win/Loss
53% (58/52)
55% (398/326)
Sets Win/Loss
50% (121/119)
53% (3509/3144)
Games Win/Loss
49% (1068/1100)
59% (101/69)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (35/26)
55% (64/53)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (22/21)
13% (1/7)
Indoor Hard W/L
17% (1/5)
56% (9/7)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.16
Aces Per Game
0.06
503
Aces Total
60
0.41
Double Faults Per Game
0.24
1315
Total Double Faults
255
1:32:9
Average Match Time
1:29:1
390.99
Average Opponent Rank
437.84
56% (11182/20047)
1st Serve %
69% (3979/5784)
62% (6967/11182)
1st Serve Win %
55% (2196/3979)
45% (3973/8864)
2nd Serve Win %
40% (731/1805)
52% (1341/2586)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (373/756)
48% (9490/19964)
Return Points Win %
47% (2674/5718)
50% (11/11)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (4/8)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
51% (21/20)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
54% (97/81)
Challenger W/L
48% (27/29)
72% (42/16)
Futures W/L
58% (31/22)
56% (172/307)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
51% (55/107)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
35% (21/60)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
42% (8/19)
52% (55/106)
Deciding Set Win %
61% (14/23)
88% (168/148)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (52/46)
12% (168/20)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (52/6)
19% (143/27)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
17% (58/10)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
