Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Chloe Paquet Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mandlik vs Paquet analysis and find out who is favored!
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Chloe Paquet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mandlik has won 45.84% of points on his second serve, while Paquet has won 45.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mandlik, in recent form, has won 55.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paquet has won 55.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.11% and 38.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mandlik has saved 55.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paquet has saved 51.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mandlik has won 56.92% of matches played (W/L 37/ 28), with Paquet winning 50% (W/L 35/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 217/ 191), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.06% of matches (W/L 18/ 13), where as Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.98% of matches (W/L 26/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mandlik winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mandlik winning 0 and Paquet winning 2. The last match between Mandlik and Paquet was at the BGL Luxembourg Open - Luxembourg, 12-10-2019, Q1 round, I.hard with Chloe Paquet getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mandlik and Paquet have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mandlik winning 0 times and Paquet 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mandlik winning 0, and Paquet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mandlik has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.22 while Paquet has played against players with an average rank of 243.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mandlik has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paquet has won 28% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mandlik has converted 54.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paquet has converted 44.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mandlik 0 - 1 Paquet
124
Rank
97
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
154
Rank
101
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
57% (144-109)
Career Total W/L
52% (386-362)
17% (1-5)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$296,900
Career Prize Money
$218,175
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Elizabeth Mandlik | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:53 | 1:7:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (25/48) | 68% (42/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 57% (24/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 26% (6/23) | 60% (12/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 67% (6/9) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (26/62) | 60% (29/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Chloe Paquet
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elizabeth Mandlik | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 17% (1/5) | 41% (7/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 27% (4/11) | 43% (16/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (66/80) | 48% (160/170) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 4 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.48 | 0.5 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:8 | 1:43:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 165.83 | 249.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (257/472) | 57% (621/1080) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (150/257) | 61% (379/621) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (88/215) | 44% (202/459) |
| BPs Won% Total | 60% (28/47) | 41% (63/154) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (205/461) | 45% (518/1140) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (1/6) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 10% (10/1) |
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
31%
(
12 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jamie Loeb
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
55%
(
57 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
82%
(
46 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Nikola Bartunkova
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
52%
(
50 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
16
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Chloe Paquet
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Chloe Paquet
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Korneeva
Player
Chloe Paquet
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhuoxuan Bai
Player
Chloe Paquet
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mandlik Vs Paquet Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chloe Paquet
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
