Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Carolina M. Alves Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mandlik vs Alves analysis and find out who is favored!
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Carolina M. Alves Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mandlik has won 45.29% of points on his second serve, while Alves has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mandlik, in recent form, has won 56.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Alves has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.02% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mandlik has saved 54.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Alves has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mandlik has won 56.92% of matches played (W/L 37/ 28), with Alves winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Alves has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12), where as Alves has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mandlik has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.4 while Alves has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mandlik has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Alves has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mandlik has converted 54.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Alves has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mandlik 0 - 0 Alves
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elizabeth Mandlik | Carolina M. Alves |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (2/6) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 32% (6/13) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (80/98) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 4 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 39 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:27 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 159.38 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (296/528) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (179/296) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (95/232) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 58% (32/55) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (232/517) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (2/8) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 1st Match |
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jessika Ponchet
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
31%
(
12 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jamie Loeb
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Carolina M. Alves Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available
Mandlik Vs Alves Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
