Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mandlik vs Friedsam analysis and find out who is favored!
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mandlik has won 44.99% of points on his second serve, while Friedsam has won 46.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mandlik, in recent form, has won 56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Friedsam has won 52.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.61% and 31.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mandlik has saved 53.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Friedsam has saved 61.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mandlik has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 36/ 28), with Friedsam winning 42.55% (W/L 20/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 109/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12), where as Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 12/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mandlik winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mandlik winning 1 and Friedsam winning 2. The last match between Mandlik and Friedsam was at the Zavarovalnica Sava Portoroz - Portoroz, 13-09-2022, First, Hard with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mandlik and Friedsam have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mandlik winning 0 times and Friedsam 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mandlik winning 0, and Friedsam 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mandlik has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.97 while Friedsam has played against players with an average rank of 187.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mandlik has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Friedsam has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mandlik has converted 53.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Friedsam has converted 39.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mandlik 0 - 1 Friedsam
123
Rank
97
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
194
Rank
45
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
57% (145-110)
Career Total W/L
59% (355-242)
25% (2-6)
YTD W/L
27% (3-8)
$296,900
Career Prize Money
$1,003,807
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Elizabeth Mandlik | Anna-Lena Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 11 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:51 | 1:47:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 38% (22/58) | 66% (58/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 36% (8/22) | 55% (32/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (23/36) | 50% (15/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (41/88) | 47% (27/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
38%
(
22 of
58)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elizabeth Mandlik | Anna-Lena Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (2/6) | 27% (3/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 32% (6/13) | 34% (10/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (80/98) | 43% (114/153) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.48 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:28 | 1:57:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 159.38 | 197.91 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (320/572) | 68% (601/886) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (188/320) | 60% (360/601) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (102/252) | 43% (122/285) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (33/62) | 35% (32/91) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (246/560) | 40% (350/877) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (2/8) | 27% (3/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 43% (7/3) |
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jessika Ponchet
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
31%
(
12 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jamie Loeb
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
33
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
113)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Talia Gibson
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
7
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Greetje Minnen
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mandlik Vs Friedsam Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
