Elizabeth Coleman vs Alycia Parks Important H2H Prediction Stats:

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Coleman has won 41.18% of points on his second serve, while Parks has won 40.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Coleman, in recent form, has won 57.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Parks has won 50.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.91% and 34.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Coleman has saved 16.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Parks has saved 52.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Coleman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Parks winning 34.09% (W/L 15/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Coleman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5). Parks has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 25/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7).
• Player level: In the last year, Coleman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Parks has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 6/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Coleman winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Coleman winning 0 and Parks winning 2. The last match between Coleman and Parks was at the Hilton Head Island, 02-10-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Alycia Parks getting the victory .
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Coleman and Parks have played a deciding set 0 times, with Coleman winning 0 times and Parks 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Coleman winning 0, and Parks 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Coleman has played against opponents with an average rank of 253 while Parks has played against players with an average rank of 125.05.
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Coleman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Parks has won 21% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Coleman has converted 100% of breakpoint opportunities, and Parks has converted 42.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.