Eliz Maloney vs Sofia Costoulas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W L W W W L
Form
W W W W W W W W L LHead To Head: Maloney 0 - 1 Costoulas
They have played 3 sets in total, with Maloney winning 1 and Costoulas winning 2. The last match between Maloney and Costoulas was at the W35 Manchester, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Sofia Costoulas getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eliz Maloney | 0 |
| Sofia Costoulas | 1 |
W35 Manchester(18-02-2025)
4
6
6
1
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dimitrov VS Nakashima PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Eliz Maloney
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
100
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
1
Sets Won
2
8
Games Won
16
2
Aces (Total)
8
1
Total Double Faults
1
2:7:29
Average Match Time
2:7:29
67% (52/78)
1st Serve %
73% (67/92)
50% (26/52)
1st Serve Win %
66% (44/67)
42% (11/26)
2nd Serve Win %
60% (15/25)
18% (2/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
46% (6/13)
36% (33/92)
Return Points Win %
53% (41/78)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
100% (1/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Eliz Maloney vs Sofia Costoulas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Eliz Maloney 0 - 1 Sofia Costoulas
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: Examining recent form over the last six months, it is observed that Maloney has achieved a 38.54% success rate in winning points on their second serve. In contrast, Costoulas has displayed a superior performance, winning 49.57% of points on their second serve. It is worth noting that a significant correlation exists between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Insights on Return Game Statistics: Taking into account recent form, Maloney has proven their prowess by winning 50% of the points on their opponent's second serve. On the other hand, Costoulas has surpassed Maloney, showcasing a higher success rate of 51.74%. In regards to first serve returns, Maloney has demonstrated a 39.36% efficiency, while Costoulas has showcased a lower but still commendable rate of 37.1%. These return game statistics significantly contribute to determining the favored player in their upcoming head-to-head matchup.
Analysis of Performance Under Pressure: When faced with intense pressure, Maloney has garnered a remarkable 60% save rate for breakpoints in recent matches. Comparatively, Costoulas has managed to save 58.65% of breakpoints, signifying their ability to navigate challenging situations. This statistic holds considerable relevance when making predictions for in-game betting scenarios.
Performance Overview: In the past year, Maloney has attained a 31.58% victory rate in the matches they participated in (W/L 6/13). In remarkable contrast, Costoulas has excelled, securing a 58.44% triumph rate (W/L 45/32). Considering these overall head-to-head statistics, a comprehensive prediction overview emerges.
Identification of the Best Surface: Evaluating historical career data, it is evident that Maloney has achieved the highest win percentage on I.hard surfaces, triumphing in 57% of their matches (W/L 26/20). Conversely, their performance on Grass surfaces has been subpar, with a 0% success rate (W/L 0/3). Costoulas, on the other hand, has displayed their proficiency on Hard surfaces, garnering a notable win percentage of 65% (W/L 73/40). However, their weakest performance lies in matches on Clay surfaces, where they have achieved a 51% win rate (W/L 40/38).
Evaluation of Player Level: Over the past year, Maloney has predominantly competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. Within this domain, they have achieved a 28.57% victory rate (W/L 4/10). Conversely, Costoulas has also gained significant experience in Challenger and ITF tournaments exceeding $10,000, concluding matches with a commendable 57.75% success rate (W/L 41/30). To accurately predict the favored player, it is vital to contextualize their performance statistics within the event level they have predominantly competed in.
Examination of Opponent Quality: Assessing the opponents faced within the last twelve months, it is evident that Maloney has engaged with players holding an average rank of 266.05. Conversely, Costoulas has confronted opponents boasting an average rank of 403.96. These contrasting opponent quality metrics should be considered when forecasting the outcome of the upcoming match.
Deciding Set Performance against All Players: For those seeking live predictions and engaging in betting activities, it is noteworthy that Maloney has triumphed in 50% of deciding sets over the previous twelve months. Costoulas, on the other hand, has emerged victorious in 65% of all matches played on the tour. These statistics become highly relevant if the match transitions into a decisive set.
Relevance of Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performances significantly contribute to predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to evaluate current event statistics to identify in-form players. Thus, for up-to-date indications of player performance within the ongoing event, it is advised to refer to the section below (if applicable). Furthermore, considering that players may exhibit differing levels of competency depending on the event, this aspect must be factored in when forecasting the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion Insights: In recent form, Maloney has impressively converted 50% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Costoulas has displayed a slightly lower conversion rate of 46.38% in their attempts to break their opponents' serves. This particular statistic becomes revealing when seeking in-game live betting tips, especially when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are intrigued by predictive models for tennis matches, this article offers a valuable starting point. It is important to note that this article is primarily intended for statistics enthusiasts.
Eliz Maloney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Eliz Maloney
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliz Maloney
Player
Summer Yardley
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
38%
(
13 of
34)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
13
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentina Steiner
Player
Eliz Maloney
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Eliz Maloney
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
100
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Eliz Maloney
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Malygina
Player
Eliz Maloney
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
77%
(
79 of
102)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sofia Costoulas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Sofia Costoulas
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Sofia Costoulas
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Sandra Samir
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Katerina Tsygourova
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Jessica Pieri
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
83%
(
38 of
46)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Malene Helgo
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
77%
(
10 of
13)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
11 of
11)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
20
Total Points Won
9
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Julie Belgraver
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
48%
(
43 of
90)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Ella Mcdonald
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Milla Kotamaeki
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
48
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
53% (112/99)
Win/Loss
60% (140/95)
53% (249/219)
Sets Win/Loss
58% (317/229)
52% (2188/2057)
Games Win/Loss
54% (2655/2302)
55% (65/53)
Hard Win/Loss
65% (73/40)
50% (16/16)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (40/38)
53% (31/27)
Indoor Hard W/L
61% (27/17)
0% (0/3)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.1
Aces Per Game
0.26
210
Aces Total
629
0.15
Double Faults Per Game
0.21
305
Total Double Faults
502
1:6:37
Average Match Time
1:50:47
414.43
Average Opponent Rank
435.97
69% (6474/9383)
1st Serve %
61% (9645/15807)
58% (3784/6474)
1st Serve Win %
63% (6124/9645)
45% (1296/2909)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (2910/6162)
47% (535/1147)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (974/2031)
45% (4169/9233)
Return Points Win %
46% (7361/16112)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (48/52)
Challenger W/L
59% (117/81)
58% (64/47)
Futures W/L
63% (22/13)
53% (112/210)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (140/233)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
62% (18/29)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
58% (26/45)
47% (22/47)
Deciding Set Win %
53% (41/78)
88% (117/103)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (136/115)
12% (117/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (136/20)
10% (94/9)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
25% (99/25)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
