Elina Avanesyan vs Veronica Cepede Royg Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L W L W L
Form
L W W W L L L W L LH2H: Avanesyan 1 - 1 Royg
They have played 4 sets in total, with Avanesyan winning 2 and Royg winning 2. The last match between Avanesyan and Royg was at the W60 Brasilia, 27-11-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Elina Avanesyan getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Elina Avanesyan | 1 |
| Veronica Cepede Royg | 1 |
W60 Brasilia(27-11-2021)
6
2
6
3
| Avanesyan | Stats | Royg |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (11-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 36 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 73 |
| 22 | Age | 33 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 14 |
| 61% (194-124) | Career Total W/L | 61% (428-279) |
| $1,618,746 | Career Prize Money | $490,909 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Djokovic VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-0 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Elina Avanesyan
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 18 | Games Won | 18 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:28:0 | Average Match Time | 1:28:0 |
| 64% (92/144) | 1st Serve % | 64% (75/118) |
| 57% (52/92) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (44/75) |
| 40% (21/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (17/43) |
| 50% (9/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (9/27) |
| 48% (57/118) | Return Points Win % | 49% (71/144) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Elina Avanesyan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Elina Avanesyan
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Erika Andreeva
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
94)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Elina Avanesyan
44%
(
28 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Lauren Davis
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Elina Avanesyan
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Maya Joint
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Magdalena Frech
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Elina Avanesyan
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Elina Avanesyan
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Veronica Cepede Royg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
80
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
67%
(
84 of
125)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
14
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
77
Total Points Won
82
|
0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
47 of
57)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Sofia Da Cruz Mendonca
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
58)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
12
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (194/124) | Win/Loss | 61% (428/279) |
| 59% (436/301) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (949/689) |
| 54% (3621/3076) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (8035/6954) |
| 51% (45/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (117/106) |
| 67% (130/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (282/137) |
| 53% (10/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (8/13) |
| 56% (9/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (21/23) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 219 | Aces Total | 366 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 677 | Total Double Faults | 1036 |
| 1:37:13 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 362.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 536.67 |
| 71% (15283/21581) | 1st Serve % | 65% (16200/25047) |
| 58% (8890/15283) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (9722/16200) |
| 44% (2802/6298) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4206/8847) |
| 51% (1517/2982) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1414/2995) |
| 49% (10574/21597) | Return Points Win % | 45% (10985/24215) |
| 59% (19/13) | Slam W/L | 40% (24/36) |
| 47% (15/17) | Masters W/L | 39% (7/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 75% (33/11) |
| 58% (42/30) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (50/51) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (61/40) | Challenger W/L | 62% (232/141) |
| 70% (57/24) | Futures W/L | 74% (82/29) |
| 62% (193/310) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (423/702) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (28/56) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (88/156) |
| 56% (56/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (129/228) |
| 85% (196/166) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (413/362) |
| 15% (196/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (413/51) |
| 23% (121/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (294/65) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
