J. Grabher
To Win
A. Banks
To Win
Elina Avanesyan vs Julia Grabher Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L L L L
Form
L W W W W L L W W LH2H: Avanesyan 0 - 0 Grabher
| Avanesyan | Stats | Grabher |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (11-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (32-16) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 48 | Ranking | 141 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 54 |
| 22 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 17 |
| 60% (194-127) | Career Total W/L | 60% (396-261) |
| $1,618,746 | Career Prize Money | $402,254 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
Upcoming Match
- / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Perricard VS Norrie PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bonzi VS Holt PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
24 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Avanesyan vs Grabher Match Preview :
- Avanesyan has been performing slightly better on their second serve, winning 42.57% of points compared to Grabher's 38.47%. Could this indicate a potential advantage?
- In terms of returning the opponent's serve, Avanesyan shows more strength, with a 54.12% win rate on opponent's second serves versus Grabher's 45.11%.
- Analyzing first serve returns, Avanesyan also leads with 36.41% success, surpassing Grabher's 29.53%.
- When under pressure, Avanesyan has a slight edge in saving breakpoints at 47.79%, compared to 45.51% for Grabher.
- Looking at overall match performance in the past year, Grabher has been more successful, winning 64.38% of matches, whereas Avanesyan has won 55.17%.
- Both players excel on clay, but Avanesyan has a slightly higher win percentage (66%) compared to Grabher's 65%.
- Avanesyan has been competing at the main tour level, facing opponents with an average rank of 76, while Grabher has played mostly in Challengers/ITF events, encountering opponents averaging a rank of 297.79.
- In deciding set situations, Avanesyan has a narrow advantage, winning 52% compared to Grabher's 50%.
- Avanesyan has been more effective in converting break points, with a rate of 41.76%, superior to Grabher's 36.71%.
Editorial Prediction (May 18, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming match between Avanesyan and Grabher, several key statistics provide insights into potential advantages. Avanesyan's superior performance on both second serves and return games suggest a marginal edge in play consistency and resilience under pressure.
Moreover, Avanesyan has faced tougher competition over the past year, competing at the main tour level, which could better prepare them for high-stakes matches compared to Grabher's experience predominantly in lower-tier tournaments.
While Grabher boasts a higher overall match win percentage in the past year, the head-to-head stats, especially on clay where both players perform well, favor Avanesyan.
Considering these factors, Avanesyan appears to be slightly more poised for victory in this matchup against Grabher.
Avanesyan vs Grabher Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Elina Avanesyan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Elina Avanesyan
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Elina Avanesyan
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Dolehide
Player
Elina Avanesyan
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Elina Avanesyan
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Erika Andreeva
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
94)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Elina Avanesyan
44%
(
28 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Lauren Davis
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Elina Avanesyan
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Grabher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Julia Grabher
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Julia Grabher
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Caty McNally
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Kyoka Okamura
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (194/127) | Win/Loss | 60% (396/261) |
| 59% (437/307) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (875/613) |
| 54% (3641/3116) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7262/6187) |
| 51% (45/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (30/36) |
| 66% (130/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (346/185) |
| 53% (10/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35% (19/36) |
| 56% (9/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 220 | Aces Total | 689 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 688 | Total Double Faults | 2458 |
| 1:37:11 | Average Match Time | 1:21:51 |
| 375.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 475 |
| 71% (15403/21768) | 1st Serve % | 65% (23813/36828) |
| 58% (8957/15403) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (14817/23813) |
| 44% (2821/6365) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5801/13013) |
| 51% (1525/3004) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2383/4864) |
| 49% (10654/21790) | Return Points Win % | 47% (17571/37441) |
| 58% (19/14) | Slam W/L | 37% (10/17) |
| 44% (15/19) | Masters W/L | 47% (8/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 58% (42/30) | Main Tour W/L | 34% (20/38) |
| 60% (61/40) | Challenger W/L | 63% (255/149) |
| 70% (57/24) | Futures W/L | 74% (96/33) |
| 62% (193/313) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (389/644) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (28/56) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (64/130) |
| 55% (56/101) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (96/181) |
| 85% (196/166) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (386/345) |
| 15% (196/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (386/40) |
| 23% (124/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (271/53) |
Avanesyan vs. Grabher Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
