Prediction of Elena Pridankina [186th] vs Celine Naef [178th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L W W L
Form
W W L W W W L L L WHead-2-Head: Pridankina 2 - 0 Naef
They have played 5 sets in total, with Pridankina winning 4 and Naef winning 1. The last match between Pridankina and Naef was at the W75 Trnava, 01-03-2025, Semifinals, I.hard with Elena Pridankina getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Elena Pridankina | 2 |
| Celine Naef | 0 |
| Pridankina | Stats | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (16-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (8-6) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 186 | Ranking | 178 |
| 175 | Highest Rank | 121 |
| 19 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 7 |
| 70% (145-62) | Career Total W/L | 65% (117-63) |
| $8,630 | Career Prize Money | $220,512 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Pridankina VS Naef H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-2 1-6 7-6(5) |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
Pridankina VS Naef H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 21 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 2:5:12 | Average Match Time | 2:5:12 |
| 66% (105/159) | 1st Serve % | 58% (98/168) |
| 65% (68/105) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (62/98) |
| 50% (27/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (32/70) |
| 36% (8/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (6/18) |
| 44% (74/168) | Return Points Win % | 40% (64/159) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Elena Pridankina vs Celine Naef Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pridankina 2 - 0 Naef
Editorial Prediction:
In the last six months, a key area of comparison between Elena Pridankina and Naef has been their second serve performance. Pridankina has secured 36.12% of points on her second serve, while Naef has managed a slightly higher 41.92%. This statistic holds significant weight in predicting match outcomes.
Analyzing return game stats reveals that Pridankina has won 51.87% of their opponents' second serve points compared to Naef's 46%. Additionally, Pridankina outperforms Naef on first serve returns, achieving success rates of 31.33% and 30.4%, respectively. These numbers heavily influence predictions in head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, Naef has saved 45.56% of breakpoints, outperforming Pridankina's 43.68% success rate. This is an important figure for insights into in-game betting predictions. Furthermore, Pridankina has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Naef has a conversion rate of 37.69%, indicating a potential advantage during breakpoints.
Looking at a broader performance overview, Pridankina has won 62.69% of her matches in the past year (42 wins and 25 losses), while Naef's win rate sits at 59.38% (38 wins and 26 losses). Both players have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with success rates of 66.1% and 66.67% for Pridankina and Naef, respectively.
Considering their preferred surfaces, Pridankina's best surface is I.hard, where she boasts a 75% win rate, while her performance drops to 68% on hard courts. Naef's strongest surface is also I.hard with a 74% win rate, but their performance on grass is 50%, indicating a weaker grasp on that surface.
In their head-to-head records, Pridankina has defeated Naef in their sole previous encounter, winning 2 of the 3 sets played. They last met at the W 75 Maribor on March 19, 2024, where Pridankina triumphed with a 6-2, 1-6, 7-6(5) victory, and claimed the deciding set they've contested.
Although Naef has faced opponents with an average rank of 210.42 in the past 12 months compared to Pridankina's opponents at 305.13, Pridankina's ability to win tiebreaks and deciding sets against Naef gives her an upper hand. Therefore, based on these comprehensive statistics, Pridankina is favored to win the upcoming match.
Elena Pridankina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Elena Pridankina
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Anna Bondar
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Carson Branstine
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tara Wuerth
Player
Elena Pridankina
60%
(
73 of
121)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
9
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
35%
(
17 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
116
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Elena Pridankina
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
55%
(
50 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Ella Seidel
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Vlada Guryleva
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Ayla Aksu
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Elena Pridankina
65%
(
82 of
126)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
104)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
60 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
58 of
104)
124
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Marta Kostyuk
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
132%
(
70 of
53)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Celine Naef
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Ella Seidel
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Linda Klimovicova
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Lian Tran
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70% (145/62) | Win/Loss | 65% (117/63) |
| 68% (314/145) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (259/161) |
| 58% (2382/1703) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2117/1732) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 332 | Aces Total | 521 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 589 | Total Double Faults | 388 |
| 1:32:53 | Average Match Time | 1:35:50 |
| 373.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 302.94 |
| 65% (8044/12417) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7400/12291) |
| 64% (5184/8044) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4759/7400) |
| 46% (2022/4372) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2387/4891) |
| 51% (917/1809) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (779/1556) |
| 49% (6281/12833) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5704/12338) |
| 70% (141/201) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (117/180) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (22/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (21/35) |
| 45% (23/51) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (35/60) |
| 89% (150/133) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (109/95) |
| 11% (150/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (109/14) |
| 19% (57/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (71/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
