Y. W. Ku
To Win
Y. Lee
To Win
Elena Micic vs Yeon Woo Ku Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L L L L
Form
W L W W W W L W W WH2H: Micic 2 - 0 Ku
They have played 6 sets in total, with Micic winning 4 and Ku winning 2. The last match between Micic and Ku was at the W35 Swan Hill, 21-03-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Grass, with Elena Micic getting the victory 5-7 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Elena Micic | 2 |
| Yeon Woo Ku | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Swan Hill(21-03-2025)
Elena Micic
Yeon Woo Ku
5
7
7
5
6
2
| Micic | Stats | Ku |
|---|---|---|
| 39% (7-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (18-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 349 | Ranking | 460 |
| 349 | Highest Rank | 411 |
| 20 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 49% (73-75) | Career Total W/L | 63% (175-104) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $9,533 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Li VS Joint PREDICTION Clay
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Djokovic PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Elena Micic
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 0-6 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 31 | Games Won | 27 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:55:7 | Average Match Time | 1:55:7 |
| 71% (125/175) | 1st Serve % | 64% (119/187) |
| 58% (73/125) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (76/119) |
| 52% (26/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (26/68) |
| 48% (12/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (10/20) |
| 45% (85/187) | Return Points Win % | 43% (76/175) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Micic vs Ku Match Preview :
How does the second serve performance influence the outcome of a match between Micic and Ku? In the past six months, Micic has slightly edged out Ku, winning 42.35% of points on their second serve compared to Ku's 41.02%. This subtle difference might seem minor but can significantly tip the scales in a tightly contested match.
When returning games, Micic outperforms Ku on second serve returns, winning 49.51% against Ku's 48.56%. However, Ku claws back some advantage during first serve returns, scoring 37.36% over Micic's 31.19%. These figures can be instrumental in predicting who emerges as the frontrunner in a head-to-head encounter.
Breakpoints are another crucial piece of this puzzle. While Ku has saved 50.19% of breakpoints in recent encounters, Micic is not far behind with a 47.94% success rate. This can be key information, particularly for those interested in wagering while the match unfolds.
Across the recent year, Micic boasts a win rate of 62.71%, contrasted with Ku's 55.56%. This difference certainly gives Micic the upper hand in overall match outcomes, painting a clearer picture for predictions.
The playing surface is another factor not to be overlooked. Micic thrives on grass courts with a career win rate of 63%, whereas Ku shines on indoor hard courts, boasting a 69% success rate. Before placing any bets or predictions, consider the surface they’re competing on.
Looking into the tournament level where these players have recently competed, Micic has seen a 62.75% win rate at the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, while Ku has claimed victories in 54.35% of their matches at the same level. Versus each other, Micic won their previous encounter, setting an interesting backdrop for this rematch.
History suggests Micic’s resilience in pressure situations might give them an edge, having triumphed in a deciding set the one time such a scenario occurred between these two players. Additionally, Micic has a stellar record, winning 77% of all deciding sets over the past year, a noteworthy statistic for anyone eyeing live bets.
From analyzing these statistics, Micic appears poised to claim victory over Ku, not only due to their past head-to-head win but a slight edge across multiple facets of play. Betting on Micic seems rational based on these predictive stats, but as with all sporting events, surprises are always possible.
Micic vs Ku Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Elena Micic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Defne Cirpanli
Player
Elena Micic
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Elena Micic
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Elena Micic
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Elena Micic
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Belle Thompson
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Carolann Delaunay
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Elena Micic
74%
(
89 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
53 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
117
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Yeon Woo Ku Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Wushuang Zheng
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
22 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
79%
(
60 of
76)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
38%
(
18 of
48)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
62%
(
42 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Rina Saigo
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Arina Varaksina
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
15 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (73/75) | Win/Loss | 63% (175/104) |
| 49% (163/171) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (399/240) |
| 50% (1504/1507) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (3276/2505) |
| 54% (62/52) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (129/80) |
| 18% (4/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (24/13) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (20/9) |
| 60% (6/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 249 | Aces Total | 191 |
| 0.46 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 681 | Total Double Faults | 902 |
| 1:23:57 | Average Match Time | 1:24:7 |
| 364.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 447.01 |
| 65% (5596/8561) | 1st Serve % | 63% (10110/16001) |
| 59% (3318/5596) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (6125/10110) |
| 42% (1256/2965) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2658/5891) |
| 47% (494/1043) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1201/2318) |
| 45% (3837/8467) | Return Points Win % | 50% (7975/15910) |
| 67% (2/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 52% (64/58) | Challenger W/L | 59% (107/75) |
| 32% (7/15) | Futures W/L | 75% (62/21) |
| 49% (72/147) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (173/275) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 58% (11/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (27/58) |
| 54% (20/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (32/81) |
| 86% (70/60) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (182/154) |
| 14% (70/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (182/28) |
| 17% (78/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (97/21) |
Micic vs. Ku Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
