S. Sierra
To Win
T. Andrianjafitrimo
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W W W W LForm
L W L W W W L W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Ruse winning 2 and Sierra winning 0. The last match between Ruse and Sierra was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 05-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Elena Gabriela Ruse getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Elena Gabriela Ruse | 1 |
Solana Sierra | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome(05-05-2025)
Ruse | Stats | Sierra |
---|---|---|
70% (23-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 73% (29-11) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
57 | Ranking | 100 |
51 | Highest Rank | 100 |
27 | Age | 21 |
R | Plays | - |
7 | Titles | 15 |
62% (329-199) | Career Total W/L | 70% (188-81) |
$1,684,714 | Career Prize Money | $226,625 |
0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Solana Sierra
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 7 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:28:34 | Average Match Time | 1:28:34 |
60% (40/67) | 1st Serve % | 52% (30/58) |
78% (31/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (21/30) |
48% (13/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (12/28) |
80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
43% (25/58) | Return Points Win % | 34% (23/67) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing second serve performance in recent form, Ruse has secured 41.77% of points, whereas Sierra has achieved a slightly lower figure of 38.77%. This metric often correlates strongly with match prediction accuracy, offering insights into potential outcomes. In the return game statistics, Ruse has won 51.54% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Sierra's 50.61%. With first serve return rates at 29.2% for Ruse and 33.93% for Sierra, these figures significantly influence head-to-head matchup predictions.
Examining their ability to handle pressure, Ruse and Sierra have both displayed resilience. Ruse has successfully saved 48.17% of breakpoints, while Sierra slightly edges out with 49.31%. For those interested in in-game betting predictions, these statistics provide valuable insights. In terms of match performance over the last year, Ruse has won 66.07% of their matches, boasting a W/L record of 37/19, while Sierra has performed even better, winning 76.92% of their ties with a record of 60/18.
Both players present impressive career statistics on clay surfaces. Ruse holds a 63% win record (W/L 167/96), while Sierra leads with 72% (W/L 141/56). Conversely, Ruse struggles more on indoor hard courts with a 57% win rate, and Sierra shows their weakness on grass, remaining winless. During the past year, Ruse has focused on Grand Slam events, achieving a 77.78% win ratio (W/L 14/4), while Sierra's efforts were geared more towards Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving an 81.82% win rate (W/L 54/12). As expected, the quality of opponents varied, with Ruse facing competitors with an average rank of 205.79 and Sierra's opponents averaging a rank of 285.83.
Ruse’s performance in deciding sets over the last 12 months shows that she has won 65% of these close encounters. In comparison, Sierra has managed a 61% victory rate in her deciding sets. In terms of converting break points, Sierra excels, having converted 40.12% of opportunities, surpassing Ruse’s 36.84% conversion rate. While past performance is critical in predicting match outcomes, observing current form at the ongoing event could also provide insights. Given the comprehensive statistical analysis, looking at the overall comparison, Sierra’s higher winning percentage and stronger performance under pressure suggest she is likely to emerge victorious in this match-up.
Ruse vs Sierra Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Elise Mertens
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
96)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Carson Branstine
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Katarzyna Kawa
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Mihaela Buzarnescu
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
5
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Solana Sierra
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Solana Sierra
Player
Ariana Geerlings
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Solana Sierra
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Solana Sierra
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Solana Sierra
Player
Xiyu Wang
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Solana Sierra
Player
Daria Snigur
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Solana Sierra
Player
Susan Bandecchi
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Julie Belgraver
Player
Solana Sierra
57%
(
68 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
43 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
125)
124
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (329/199) | Win/Loss | 70% (188/81) |
60% (717/486) | Sets Win/Loss | 67% (409/204) |
54% (5988/5020) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (3154/2357) |
63% (85/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (40/19) |
64% (171/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 71% (147/60) |
57% (47/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
63% (26/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
1079 | Aces Total | 246 |
0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
2178 | Total Double Faults | 1052 |
1:28:56 | Average Match Time | 1:31:21 |
432.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 401.75 |
58% (18553/32087) | 1st Serve % | 64% (10517/16447) |
64% (11851/18553) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (6461/10517) |
45% (6069/13534) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2699/5930) |
50% (2190/4393) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (1260/2328) |
48% (15740/32730) | Return Points Win % | 50% (8280/16558) |
64% (39/22) | Slam W/L | 54% (7/6) |
61% (23/15) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 71% (5/2) |
63% (81/48) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) |
58% (134/96) | Challenger W/L | 72% (141/56) |
75% (50/17) | Futures W/L | 69% (34/15) |
63% (327/518) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 70% (185/265) |
0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
48% (54/113) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (32/55) |
61% (93/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (43/79) |
90% (311/281) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (181/163) |
10% (311/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (181/18) |
22% (216/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (88/25) |