E. G. Ruse
To Win
M. Kessler
To Win
Elena Gabriela Ruse vs Ena Shibahara Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L W W W L
Form
L L W W W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Ruse 1 - 0 Shibahara
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ruse winning 2 and Shibahara winning 1. The last match between Ruse and Shibahara was at the Miami Open - Miami, 17-03-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Elena Gabriela Ruse getting the victory 4-6 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Elena Gabriela Ruse | 1 |
| Ena Shibahara | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Miami Open - Miami(17-03-2025)
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Ena Shibahara
4
6
6
1
7
5
| Ruse | Stats | Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (16-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (17-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 85 | Ranking | 123 |
| 51 | Highest Rank | 123 |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 1 |
| 62% (322-197) | Career Total W/L | 59% (154-107) |
| $1,549,029 | Career Prize Money | $205,348 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Riera PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sramkova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Ena Shibahara
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:12:21 | Average Match Time | 2:12:21 |
| 64% (56/87) | 1st Serve % | 66% (62/94) |
| 64% (36/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (30/62) |
| 45% (14/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (17/32) |
| 53% (8/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 50% (47/94) | Return Points Win % | 43% (37/87) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ruse vs Shibahara Match Preview :
In an analytical comparison of recent performances, Ruse has a second serve success rate of 38.58%, while Shibahara slightly outperforms with 43.74%. This statistic is crucial for correlating accurate match outcome predictions, highlighting Shibahara's current edge in this area.
When examining return game statistics, Ruse has secured 49.22% of points on their opponent's second serves, compared to Shibahara's close 49.05%. First serve return stats show a distinction, as Shibahara leads with 32.25%, surpassing Ruse's 28.12%. This difference suggests a preference for Shibahara in this head-to-head matchup.
Analyzing performance under pressure, Shibahara has saved 48% of breakpoints, slightly more effective than Ruse's 47.13%. This detail plays a significant role in game predictions, especially for live betting scenarios where breakpoint dynamics are pivotal.
Considering the overall win percentage from the past year, Ruse achieved a win rate of 65%, while Shibahara closely follows with 63.93%. Ruse demonstrates prowess on clay with a 64% win rate, whereas Shibahara excels on indoor hard courts at 68%. However, Shibahara's relative weakness on clay is apparent with a balanced 50% win rate.
Both players frequently compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, where Ruse holds a 56.52% win rate and Shibahara performs slightly better at 61.29%. The opponent quality analysis reveals Ruse has faced tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 206.17 compared to Shibahara's 235.89 over the past year.
If the match extends to a deciding set, Shibahara's 67% success rate offers an advantage over Ruse's 63%. Additionally, recent form displays Ruse converting 40% of breakpoint opportunities, while Shibahara is at 36.63%, indicating a strategic nuance relevant in live betting scenarios.
Taking all statistics into consideration, Shibahara emerges as the favorite under current predictive metrics due to her strengths in key areas such as second serve performance, breakpoint conversion, and first serve returns.
Ruse vs Shibahara Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Elena Gabriela Ruse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Polina Kudermetova
55%
(
68 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
107)
7
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
4
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
24 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(10) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Laura Siegemund
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Solana Sierra
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Teodora Kostovic
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
68%
(
89 of
131)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
44%
(
58 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
114
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Jessika Ponchet
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Camilla Rosatello
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
81 of
125)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
58 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Jenny Lim
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Ena Shibahara
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Ena Shibahara
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
52%
(
38 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Ayla Aksu
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Nao Hibino
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Tereza Valentova
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (322/197) | Win/Loss | 59% (154/107) |
| 59% (702/481) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (345/261) |
| 54% (5877/4946) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2973/2604) |
| 63% (85/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (109/77) |
| 64% (170/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (16/14) |
| 57% (47/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (24/11) |
| 59% (20/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1047 | Aces Total | 640 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2143 | Total Double Faults | 642 |
| 1:28:43 | Average Match Time | 1:25:7 |
| 432.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 405.64 |
| 58% (18207/31507) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9216/14825) |
| 64% (11608/18207) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5944/9196) |
| 45% (5957/13300) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2747/5685) |
| 50% (2147/4307) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (783/1739) |
| 48% (15422/32078) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6596/15015) |
| 64% (38/21) | Slam W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 61% (23/15) | Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 61% (75/47) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (19/24) |
| 58% (134/96) | Challenger W/L | 62% (124/75) |
| 75% (50/17) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (320/509) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (151/256) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (53/111) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (34/58) |
| 61% (92/150) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (49/89) |
| 90% (304/275) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (153/133) |
| 10% (304/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (153/19) |
| 21% (214/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (108/20) |
Ruse vs. Shibahara Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
