Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elaine Chervinsky vs Gianna Pielet Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chervinsky vs Pielet analysis and find out who is favored!
Elaine Chervinsky vs Gianna Pielet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chervinsky has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Pielet has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chervinsky, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pielet has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chervinsky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pielet has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chervinsky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Pielet winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chervinsky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Pielet has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 39/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chervinsky winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chervinsky winning 1 and Pielet winning 2. The last match between Chervinsky and Pielet was at the W25 Daytona Beach, 13-01-2020, Q1 round, Clay with Gianna Pielet getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chervinsky and Pielet have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chervinsky winning 0 times and Pielet 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chervinsky winning 0, and Pielet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chervinsky has played against opponents with an average rank of while Pielet has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chervinsky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pielet has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chervinsky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pielet has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chervinsky 0 - 1 Pielet
Ret.
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
38% (3-5)
Career Total W/L
55% (50-41)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chervinsky VS Pielet H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Elaine Chervinsky | Gianna Pielet |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Chervinsky VS Pielet H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 6-1 10-6 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elaine Chervinsky | Gianna Pielet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Elaine Chervinsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Maria Mateas
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
27 of
60)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 0-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Hu
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
14
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Natasha Subhash
Player
Elaine Chervinsky
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elaine Chervinsky
Player
Kimmi Hance
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elaine Chervinsky
Player
Mackenzie Clark
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elaine Chervinsky
Player
Sophia Hatton
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gianna Pielet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatum Evans
Player
Gianna Pielet
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
36%
(
10 of
28)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
48
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Katarina Kozarov
Player
Gianna Pielet
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianna Pielet
Player
Chieh-Yu Hsu
42%
(
25 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianna Pielet
Player
Filippa Bruu-Syversen
31%
(
16 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianna Pielet
Player
Meisha Kendall-Woseley
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anhzelika Isaeva
Player
Gianna Pielet
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianna Pielet
Player
Raveena Kingsley
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
16 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olga Helmi
Player
Gianna Pielet
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianna Pielet
Player
Feryel Ben Hassen
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Chervinsky Vs Pielet Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
