T. Lemaitre
To Win
J. Lu
To Win
Ela Nala Milic vs Tiphanie Lemaitre Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L W W L L
Form
W W W W L W W L W LHead-to-head: Milic 0 - 1 Lemaitre
They have played 2 sets in total, with Milic winning 0 and Lemaitre winning 2. The last match between Milic and Lemaitre was at the W15 Monastir, 20-02-2025, Second, Hard with Tiphanie Lemaitre getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
W15 Monastir(20-02-2025)
6
4
6
1
Upcoming Match
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
5
Games Won
12
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
0
0:0:0
Average Match Time
0:0:0
0% (0/0)
1st Serve %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Return Points Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ela Nala Milic vs Tiphanie Lemaitre Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ela Nala Milic 0 - 1 Tiphanie Lemaitre
Predicting the Outcome of the Upcoming Tennis Match: An Insightful Analysis
In the realm of tennis predictions, various statistical insights come into play. Let's delve into an examination of the upcoming match between Milic and Lemaitre, where we will explore key factors that can influence the ultimate outcome.
-
Assessing Second Serve Performance: Recent form observed over the last six months presents an intriguing revelation. Milic has demonstrated a success rate of 43.13% when it comes to winning points on their second serve. In contrast, Lemaitre has achieved a slightly higher rate of 48.37%. It is worth mentioning that a notable correlation exists between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
-
Examining Return Game Statistics: In recent form, Milic has showcased their prowess by winning 54.53% of their opponent's second serve points. Surprisingly, Lemaitre has performed exceptionally well in this regard, securing a comparable rate of 54.81%. Additionally, let us explore their performance concerning return of first serves. Milic boasts a success rate of 41.26%, while Lemaitre has managed a slightly higher rate of 41.23%. These figures come with a considerable correlation, enabling us to discern the favored player in this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
-
Analyzing Under Pressure: A close examination of the ability to withstand pressure serves as a valuable asset in making in-game betting predictions. Recent data indicates that Milic has successfully saved 50.5% of breakpoints encountered. Conversely, Lemaitre has displayed an impressive ability to save 52.48% in similar situations. These statistics offer valuable insights into the outcome of the upcoming match.
-
Performance Overview: Considering the comprehensive analysis of the previous year, Milic has enjoyed a relatively balanced success rate, winning 50% of their matches played, with a win-loss record of 20-20. On the contrary, Lemaitre's record stands at 44.44%, having emerged victorious in 28 out of 35 matches played. Such data allows us to gain an overall perspective on how these players perform against each other.
-
Surface Specialization: Examining the players' career records on different surfaces yields fascinating insights. Milic excels on clay courts, achieving a remarkable win percentage of 51% with a record of 20 wins and 19 losses. However, their performance on indoor hard courts has been marginally weaker, winning only 22% of matches played (2 wins and 7 losses). Lemaitre, on the other hand, thrives on hard courts, winning 55% of matches played (86 wins and 70 losses). Their performance on indoor hard courts, though modestly inferior, remains relatively strong with a win percentage of 47% (21 wins and 24 losses).
-
Evaluating Player Level: Throughout the previous year, Milic predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K and emerged victorious in 47.83% of matches played (11 wins and 12 losses). Conversely, Lemaitre primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, achieving a win rate of 42.86% (21 wins and 28 losses). While reflecting on the statistical comparison between these players, it is fundamental to consider the level of the events they have participated in as a final determinant of their true potential.
-
Considering Opponent Quality: Over the past 12 months, Milic has encountered opponents with an average rank of 401.93, while Lemaitre has faced adversaries with an average rank of 400.06. This information offers valuable insights into the challenges each player has encountered, setting the stage for an enthralling encounter between them.
-
Decoding Deciding Set Performance: An intriguing aspect to explore in live predictions and betting is the players' performance when pushed to a deciding set. In the last 12 months, Milic has displayed impressive resolve, winning 54% of deciding sets. In comparison, Lemaitre has won 38% of their deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. These statistics serve as crucial indicators in assessing the potential outcome of this highly anticipated clash.
-
Evaluating Current Event H2H Stats: While past player performance yields valuable insights, it is equally imperative to consider current event stats for a holistic understanding of the players' form. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the specific event becomes significant when making accurate outcome predictions. For detailed current event statistics, please refer to the section below.
-
Break Point Conversion: Delving into recent form, Milic has demonstrated an impressive ability to convert breakpoint opportunities, capitalizing on 45.54% of their chances. Similarly, Lemaitre has showcased their proficiency, converting 44.14% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serve. These statistics assume significant importance when strategically engaging in in-game live betting.
- If you are an avid follower of models dedicated to predicting tennis matches, this article offers a valuable starting point. Note that it caters to the inquisitive minds of statistics enthusiasts.
Ela Nala Milic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Ela Nala Milic
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulia Morlet
Player
Ela Nala Milic
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(11) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ela Nala Milic
Player
Moeka Miyata
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
55%
(
37 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ela Nala Milic
Player
Viola Turini
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Ela Nala Milic
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tiphanie Lemaitre Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Fang Ying Xun
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Yingqun Sun
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Matilde Mariani
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Sara Daavettila
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
80%
(
28 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
45
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Yasmine Mansouri
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Amelie Van Impe
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Margot Phanthala
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
47% (42/48)
Win/Loss
52% (187/176)
47% (99/110)
Sets Win/Loss
50% (410/408)
49% (960/1001)
Games Win/Loss
51% (3776/3685)
48% (20/22)
Hard Win/Loss
55% (88/72)
51% (20/19)
Clay Win/Loss
49% (75/78)
22% (2/7)
Indoor Hard W/L
48% (24/26)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.05
Aces Per Game
0.1
49
Aces Total
363
0.29
Double Faults Per Game
0.29
279
Total Double Faults
1045
1:18:17
Average Match Time
1:24:27
455.11
Average Opponent Rank
467.3
68% (3140/4606)
1st Serve %
60% (11160/18628)
55% (1729/3140)
1st Serve Win %
59% (6637/11160)
41% (597/1466)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (3307/7468)
47% (274/579)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (1175/2413)
47% (2059/4379)
Return Points Win %
46% (8777/18967)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (20/22)
Challenger W/L
43% (78/102)
48% (22/24)
Futures W/L
60% (108/73)
47% (42/90)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
52% (179/346)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
50% (8/16)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
58% (36/62)
48% (14/29)
Deciding Set Win %
58% (63/109)
78% (45/35)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (180/152)
22% (45/10)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (180/27)
16% (45/7)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
18% (182/32)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
