Ekaterine Gorgodze vs Silvia Ambrosio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
W L W W W L W W L LH2H: Gorgodze 1 - 0 Ambrosio
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gorgodze winning 2 and Ambrosio winning 0. The last match between Gorgodze and Ambrosio was at the W75 Koper, 19-04-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Ekaterine Gorgodze getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ekaterine Gorgodze | 1 |
| Silvia Ambrosio | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Koper(19-04-2025)
7
6
6
2
| Gorgodze | Stats | Ambrosio |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (26-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (24-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 294 | Ranking | 314 |
| 108 | Highest Rank | 242 |
| 33 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 19 | Titles | 4 |
| 57% (567-423) | Career Total W/L | 64% (202-112) |
| $289,047 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dellien VS Minaur PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
12 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats 
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Silvia Ambrosio
90%
(
43 of
48)
1st Serve %
81%
(
43 of
53)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
52%
(
25 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
53
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:20:19 | Average Match Time | 1:20:19 |
| 90% (43/48) | 1st Serve % | 81% (43/53) |
| 51% (22/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (20/43) |
| 20% (1/5) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (3/10) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
| 57% (30/53) | Return Points Win % | 52% (25/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gorgodze vs Ambrosio Match Preview :
How crucial is a player's performance on their second serve? When evaluating recent performances, Gorgodze has secured 36.77% of points on their second serve over the past six months, while Ambrosio marginally leads with 38.12%. This subtle edge could play a significant role in predicting the victor of their upcoming clash. Understanding second-serve proficiency is critical, as it often dictates the flow of a match.
Now, let's delve into return game prowess. Gorgodze has captured 46.56% of their opponent's second serve points recently, with Ambrosio slightly surpassing that at 50%. Their efficiency on first serve returns shows Gorgodze at 40.97% and Ambrosio slightly trailing at 39.07%. These figures strongly hint at who might have an upper hand when both meet on the court. Gauging return performance provides valuable insight into potential match dynamics.
Can Gorgodze withstand critical match moments? Their ability to save breakpoints stands at 43.13%, while Ambrosio demonstrates resilience with a 43.62% rate. Such stats significantly inform in-game betting predictions. In a year-long context, Gorgodze has clinched victory in 58.57% of their matches played, compared to Ambrosio's 65.57% success rate. The comparison of their win-loss ratios certainly paints a picture of expectations.
What about surface preferences? Gorgodze shines on clay, boasting a 62% career win rate, but struggles most on indoor hard courts with a 31% win rate. Conversely, Ambrosio thrives on hard surfaces with a robust 70% win rate but has their least success on indoor hard courts, albeit a still respectable 53%. Clearly, surface type could significantly influence their impending showdown.
Examining competitive levels provides further context. Over the past year, Gorgodze and Ambrosio have both been active mostly in Challenger/ITF tournaments exceeding $10k. Gorgodze holds a 59.42% win rate, with Ambrosio slightly bettering it at 61.7%. The caliber of competition they've faced is also pivotal; Gorgodze's average opponent rank is 247.53 versus Ambrosio's closer 245.51, indicating evenly matched battlegrounds.
Thrilling final set victories often tilt the scales in matches. Gorgodze has won 48% of their deciding sets over the last year, while Ambrosio impresses with a commanding 60% success rate in similar scenarios. These stats can influence any live predictions if the match reaches the deciding moments. Furthermore, Gorgodze's recent breakpoint conversion rate stands at 44.97%, slightly outpacing Ambrosio's 42.39% - a vital indicator during pivotal match junctures.
Major tournaments highlight the capacity of players to heighten their game. For this encounter, performance at the current event could shed light on form and favoritism. While historical performance is a necessary foundation, an eye on current event form rounds up the predictions. Given these multifaceted analyses, Ambrosio appears slightly favored to prevail in their confrontation, but only time will tell if the stats write the script.
Ekaterine Gorgodze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Ekaterine Gorgodze
55%
(
71 of
130)
1st Serve %
92%
(
110 of
120)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
61 of
110)
41%
(
24 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
55 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
128
Total Points Won
122
|
6-7(7) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Sofia Shapatava
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
6 of
12)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
14
Total Points Won
16
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Rada Zolotareva
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Lisa Zaar
94%
(
51 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Polina Iatcenko
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Joanna Garland
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Martyna Kubka
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
31
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Alexandra Vagramov
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Silvia Ambrosio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Silvia Ambrosio
74%
(
61 of
82)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Silvia Ambrosio
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
53%
(
41 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Makenna Jones
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Maria Kononova
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Silvia Ambrosio
90%
(
43 of
48)
1st Serve %
81%
(
43 of
53)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
52%
(
25 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
53
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
80%
(
65 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Ziva Falkner
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Anastasiia Sobolieva
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Silvia Ambrosio
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Lois Boisson
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
41
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (567/423) | Win/Loss | 64% (202/112) |
| 57% (1305/983) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (443/279) |
| 53% (10977/9560) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (3642/2914) |
| 53% (105/95) | Hard Win/Loss | 70% (66/28) |
| 61% (438/275) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (116/64) |
| 31% (22/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (20/20) |
| 40% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 520 | Aces Total | 214 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 968 | Total Double Faults | 1146 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:34:31 |
| 527.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.46 |
| 74% (27275/36839) | 1st Serve % | 68% (12094/17720) |
| 57% (15642/27275) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (7089/12094) |
| 46% (4431/9564) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2464/5626) |
| 50% (2524/5080) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1351/2635) |
| 48% (17979/37435) | Return Points Win % | 50% (9147/18280) |
| 36% (9/16) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 37% (7/12) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (13/25) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (313/270) | Challenger W/L | 62% (113/70) |
| 70% (223/97) | Futures W/L | 68% (89/41) |
| 57% (557/974) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (196/308) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (84/180) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (30/60) |
| 44% (142/322) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (54/98) |
| 81% (613/499) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (198/175) |
| 18% (613/112) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (198/23) |
| 18% (377/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (116/27) |
Gorgodze vs. Ambrosio Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
