Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ekaterina Shalimova vs Vicky VAN DE Peer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shalimova vs Peer analysis and find out who is favored!
Ekaterina Shalimova vs Vicky VAN DE Peer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shalimova has won 48.45% of points on his second serve, while Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shalimova, in recent form, has won 54.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.11% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shalimova has saved 54.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shalimova has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 30/ 15), with Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shalimova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15). Peer has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Shalimova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76% of matches (W/L 19/ 6), where as Peer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shalimova has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.44 while Peer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shalimova has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shalimova has converted 49.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shalimova 0 - 0 Peer
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ekaterina Shalimova | Vicky VAN DE Peer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (16/14) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (143/139) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 48 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 55 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:27 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.77 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (499/911) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (313/499) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (189/412) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (59/132) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (457/973) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (6/12) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 1st Match |
Ekaterina Shalimova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Ekaterina Shalimova
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
85)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Shalimova
Player
Han Shi
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shuo Feng
Player
Ekaterina Shalimova
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Shalimova
Player
Shuoran Wang
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Ekaterina Shalimova
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Shalimova
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Ekaterina Shalimova
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
42%
(
38 of
90)
4
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Shalimova
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
50%
(
61 of
122)
1st Serve %
65%
(
78 of
120)
11
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
47 of
78)
43%
(
26 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
45%
(
55 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
120)
122
Total Points Won
120
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Shalimova
Player
Marjan Japarova
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
11
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena-Teodora Cadar
Player
Ekaterina Shalimova
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Vicky VAN DE Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Kozarov
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Eleejah Inisan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
63
|
0-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Melissa Moueza
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Aminata Sall
76%
(
95 of
125)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
118)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
14
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
118)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Nehanda Thomias
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Maklakova
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Kundali Majgaine
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Elena Jamshidi
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Shalimova Vs Peer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
