E. Reyngold
To Win
Y. W. Ku
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W W WForm
W L W W L L W L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Reyngold winning 2 and Gudelj winning 0. The last match between Reyngold and Gudelj was at the W15 Antalya, 16-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Ekaterina Reyngold getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Ekaterina Reyngold | 1 |
Vanja Gudelj | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Antalya(16-04-2025)
Reyngold | Stats | Gudelj |
---|---|---|
74% (23-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (5-7) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
584 | Ranking | N/A |
226 | Highest Rank | N/A |
24 | Age | 22 |
- | Plays | - |
2 | Titles | 0 |
59% (160-111) | Career Total W/L | 42% (52-72) |
$2,835 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
16 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
17 May 2025 / Final
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Vanja Gudelj
46%
(
12 of
26)
1st Serve %
57%
(
16 of
28)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
36
Total Points Won
18
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 3 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
0:46:32 | Average Match Time | 0:46:32 |
46% (12/26) | 1st Serve % | 57% (16/28) |
75% (9/12) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (6/16) |
57% (8/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (3/12) |
80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
68% (19/28) | Return Points Win % | 35% (9/26) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Who excels when it comes to second serve performance? In the past six months, Reyngold has shown a stronger hold, achieving success on 40.4% of points played on their second serve, noticeably ahead of Gudelj who stands at 34.88%. Intriguingly, this statistic significantly ties to the accuracy of match predictions, setting an initial stage for comparison.
Analyzing their return game abilities brings further insights. Recently, Reyngold has captured 53.57% of points when returning an opponent's second serve, whereas Gudelj is close behind at 52.94%. However, Gudelj takes a slight edge in first serve return points at 35.06%, compared to Reyngold's 32.52%. These differences could be pivotal in deciding who is favored in this head-to-head clash.
Pressure management is critical in tennis, and here Reyngold once again leads slightly with a 45.91% success rate in saving breakpoints, compared to 42.86% for Gudelj. Such numbers are invaluable for making in-game betting predictions. Across the previous year, both players show near-identical match win percentages, with Gudelj at 49.02% narrowly eclipsing Reyngold’s 47.62%, painting a balanced overview of their current form.
Surface performance reveals contrasting fortes; Reyngold performs most potently on indoor hard courts, boasting a 65% win rate, while clay is their Achilles heel at 53%. Conversely, for Gudelj, clay is a relative best with a 44% win rate, yet they falter on indoor hard court surfaces, where they have yet to notch a victory. The surface of play could hence critically impact the outcome.
Exploring the level they compete at, Reyngold primarily ventures into Challengers and ITF tournaments with a modest win rate of 51.35%, compared to Gudelj's 50% in Futures/Satellites. Player levels, and consequently competition levels faced, undoubtedly influence match outcomes – Reyngold has faced higher-ranked opponents on average, ranked at 148.93, whereas Gudelj's opponents average rank is notably lower at 43.14.
In potentially decisive moments, Gudelj has a slight edge, having won 45% of deciding sets over the past year, versus Reyngold’s 42%. This nuance might play a role in live betting scenarios. Observations of current event performance and players' history at specific tournaments could provide additional layers of prediction insight, though those specifics depend on perhaps private data or scouting reports.
Finally, break point conversion reveals Gudelj's slight favorability, successfully converting 48.84% of such opportunities compared to Reyngold’s 44.22%. With these layered statistics, while the contest appears closely matched, Gudelj might just have the slight stat-based edge to claim victory in this encounter.
Reyngold vs Gudelj Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Eunhye Lee
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Misaki Matsuda
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Ha Eum Lee
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Bunyawi Thamchaiwat
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Xiaodi You
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Vanja Gudelj
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
20%
(
2 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
17 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
47
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Vanja Gudelj
Player
Ariadna Garcia-Patron Canals
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Vanja Gudelj
46%
(
12 of
26)
1st Serve %
57%
(
16 of
28)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
36
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 7-5 10-7 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (160/111) | Win/Loss | 42% (52/72) |
58% (348/254) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (109/153) |
54% (2967/2552) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (1070/1255) |
60% (75/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 35% (7/13) |
55% (53/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (45/57) |
63% (32/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
505 | Aces Total | 35 |
0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
1092 | Total Double Faults | 188 |
1:28:28 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
461.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 219.06 |
64% (10108/15789) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1887/3089) |
61% (6207/10108) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (1003/1887) |
45% (2531/5681) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (438/1202) |
50% (1051/2114) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (156/349) |
47% (7658/16172) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1297/3022) |
0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50% (2/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
59% (103/72) | Challenger W/L | 36% (13/23) |
60% (55/36) | Futures W/L | 44% (39/49) |
59% (155/261) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (50/121) |
55% (29/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 17% (2/12) |
53% (39/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (10/17) |
88% (156/138) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (52/48) |
12% (156/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (52/4) |
19% (112/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (72/4) |