Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ekaterina Reyngold vs Noa LIAUW A Fong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Reyngold vs Fong analysis and find out who is favored!
Ekaterina Reyngold vs Noa LIAUW A Fong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Reyngold has won 43.63% of points on his second serve, while Fong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Reyngold, in recent form, has won 55.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.82% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Reyngold has saved 51.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Reyngold has won 54.35% of matches played (W/L 25/ 21), with Fong winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Reyngold has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 30/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 44/ 34). Fong has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Reyngold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.66% of matches (W/L 22/ 19), where as Fong has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Reyngold has played against opponents with an average rank of 223.67 while Fong has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Reyngold has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Reyngold has converted 47.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Reyngold 0 - 0 Fong
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ekaterina Reyngold | Noa LIAUW A Fong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (26/18) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (224/188) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 46 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 90 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 185.16 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (786/1237) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (484/786) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (197/451) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (79/165) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (605/1278) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 1st Match |
Ekaterina Reyngold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Cristina Dinu
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
76%
(
80 of
105)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
51 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Antonia Schmidt
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Prisha Vyas
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Susan Bandecchi
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Sarah Iliev
73%
(
75 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
114)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Ruth Roura Llaverias
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Noa LIAUW A Fong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayline Esina Samardzic
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
47 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaia Parravicini
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Maya Drozd
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Reyngold Vs Fong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
