Ekaterina Perelygina vs Anna Ureke Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L L W W L
Form
W L W W W L W L W WH2H: Perelygina 1 - 0 Ureke
They have played 2 sets in total, with Perelygina winning 2 and Ureke winning 0. The last match between Perelygina and Ureke was at the W15 Shymkent, 24-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Ekaterina Perelygina getting the victory 6-1 5-2 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ekaterina Perelygina | 1 |
| Anna Ureke | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Shymkent(24-04-2025)
Ekaterina Perelygina
Anna Ureke
6
1
5
2
| Perelygina | Stats | Ureke |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (21-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (7-3) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 833 | Ranking | 870 |
| 833 | Highest Rank | 631 |
| 18 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 59% (29-20) | Career Total W/L | 56% (149-118) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Brooksby VS Draper PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
15 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Minaur VS Lehecka PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
15 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Perelygina VS Ureke H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 5-2 ret. |
Stats 
Ekaterina Perelygina
Player
Anna Ureke
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Perelygina VS Ureke H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 11 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:46:45 | Average Match Time | 1:46:45 |
| 74% (48/65) | 1st Serve % | 57% (24/42) |
| 63% (30/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 35% (6/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (5/18) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 13% (2/16) |
| 64% (27/42) | Return Points Win % | 45% (29/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Perelygina vs Ureke Match Preview :
Examining the second serve performance in the last six months, Ureke has an edge, securing 38.06% of points on their second serve, while Perelygina trails slightly at 36.57%. This indicates a minor advantage for Ureke based on the high correlation between second serve performance and match outcomes.
When it comes to returning games, Ureke also demonstrates superiority by winning an impressive 60.47% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Perelygina's 52.53%. However, in first serve return stats, Perelygina slightly outperforms, with 39.13% against Ureke's 34.69%. These statistics aid in predicting which player could potentially dominate their opponent in return games.
Assessing under pressure scenarios, Ureke shows resilience by saving 41.67% of breakpoints, whereas Perelygina manages 35.26%. Ureke also excels in converting opportunities, with a breakpoint conversion rate of 58.97%, surpassing Perelygina’s 45.52%. This underlines Ureke’s ability to capitalize on critical moments in matches.
Considering recent performance metrics, Ureke has a slightly higher match win percentage over the last year, winning 66.67% of their encounters with a record of 14/7. Meanwhile, Perelygina has won 62.5% with a record of 15/9. This gives Ureke a marginally favorable outlook in this matchup.
On the surface, Ureke has demonstrated a preference for Grass, boasting a 67% win rate, while Perelygina is most successful on Hard courts, with a 69% win rate. However, both players show weakness on I.hard, implying that surface could be a neutral factor in their matchup.
Analyzing their playing levels, Ureke and Perelygina have played predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K brackets, with winning percentages of 66.67% and 65.22%, respectively. Ureke’s opponents have an average rank of 474.9, compared to Perelygina’s average opponent rank of 579.17, suggesting Ureke has faced stiffer competition.
In deciding sets, Perelygina shows remarkable strength, winning 83% of such scenarios compared to Ureke's 75% over the past year. This statistic might sway predictions for live betting if the match extends to a deciding set.
Taking into account these statistics, Ureke appears to have a slight edge in varied performance metrics. Therefore, based on current data, Ureke is predicted to triumph in this closely contested match. However, continuous observation of real-time performance at the current event may be essential for final predictions.
Perelygina vs Ureke Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ekaterina Perelygina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Ekaterina Perelygina
86%
(
86 of
100)
1st Serve %
90%
(
81 of
90)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Perelygina
Player
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
42
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Perelygina
Player
Jessica Pieri
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
49%
(
23 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
55
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Ekaterina Perelygina
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
78%
(
32 of
41)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentina Steiner
Player
Ekaterina Perelygina
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Perelygina
Player
Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Perelygina
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ekaterina Maklakova
Player
Ekaterina Perelygina
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna Ureke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Beatris Spasova
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Kira Bataikina
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Perelygina
Player
Anna Ureke
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Sofia Martianova
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Anna Ureke
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Emeline Dartron
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Valeria Bhunu
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (29/20) | Win/Loss | 56% (149/118) |
| 56% (61/47) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (329/270) |
| 53% (526/468) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2736/2448) |
| 69% (9/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 30% (11/26) |
| 59% (17/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (133/87) |
| 43% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 17 | Aces Total | 97 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 204 | Total Double Faults | 804 |
| 1:19:6 | Average Match Time | 1:36:41 |
| 509.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 475.61 |
| 66% (1580/2382) | 1st Serve % | 73% (11403/15583) |
| 56% (884/1580) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (6388/11403) |
| 41% (330/802) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (1698/4185) |
| 58% (193/335) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1216/2363) |
| 51% (1264/2486) | Return Points Win % | 50% (8177/16280) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Challenger W/L | 46% (36/43) |
| 65% (26/14) | Futures W/L | 60% (113/75) |
| 59% (29/49) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (146/257) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 82% (9/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (15/34) |
| 70% (7/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (37/68) |
| 92% (25/23) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (144/126) |
| 8% (25/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (144/18) |
| 25% (24/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (123/21) |
Perelygina vs. Ureke Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
