Prediction of Ekaterina Makarova (1996) [220th] vs Bianca Elena Barbulescu [672nd] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
.jpg "Ekaterina Makarova (1996)")
Form
W W W W L W L W L L
Form
W L W W L W W W L LHead To Head: Makarova 2 - 0 Barbulescu
They have played 4 sets in total, with Makarova winning 4 and Barbulescu winning 0. The last match between Makarova and Barbulescu was at the W15 Heraklion, 29-03-2025, Semifinals, Clay with Ekaterina Makarova (1996) getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova (1996) | 2 |
| Bianca Elena Barbulescu | 0 |
| Makarova | Stats | Barbulescu |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (12-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (12-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 220 | Ranking | 672 |
| 158 | Highest Rank | 672 |
| 29 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (250-202) | Career Total W/L | 61% (97-62) |
| $90,813 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Makarova VS Barbulescu H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats 
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
49%
(
40 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Makarova VS Barbulescu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 26 | Games Won | 15 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:59:6 | Average Match Time | 1:59:6 |
| 63% (87/138) | 1st Serve % | 64% (92/144) |
| 48% (42/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (41/92) |
| 69% (35/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (19/52) |
| 61% (14/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (9/22) |
| 58% (84/144) | Return Points Win % | 44% (61/138) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs Bianca Elena Barbulescu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Makarova 2 - 0 Barbulescu
Editorial Prediction:
Analyzing the recent second serve performance provides intriguing insights into the upcoming match. Over the past six months, Makarova has secured 38.86% of points on her second serve, whereas Barbulescu has slightly edged ahead with 39.14%. This subtle difference is noteworthy as second serve performance is a crucial indicator in predicting match outcomes, often reflecting a player's ability to maintain composure under less favorable conditions.
When examining return game statistics, Makarova exhibits an impressive capability to win 48.37% of opponents' second serve points, while Barbulescu manages a close 48.42%. On first serve returns, however, Makarova appears stronger with 40.02% compared to Barbulescu’s 36.85%, suggesting an area where Makarova might have an edge in this particular head-to-head confrontation.
The analysis of pressure management reveals Barbulescu's superior performance, saving 46.72% of break points against Makarova's 43.21%. These figures could prove pivotal during critical moments in the match, offering a glimpse into each player's resilience. The ability to convert break point opportunities is another critical measure; Barbulescu boasts a conversion rate of 43.32%, marginally higher than Makarova's 41.58%, which hints at Barbulescu’s ability to capitalize on key moments.
Looking at their overall performance over the last year, Barbulescu displays a stronger track record, winning 66.67% of her matches compared to Makarova’s 43.59%. This winning ratio suggests Barbulescu's dominance and makes her a formidable contender. Understanding their preferred surfaces further enhances the prediction model. Makarova excels on hard courts with a 59% win rate, while Barbulescu's best surface is indoor hard courts at 67%.
Reflecting on the levels of tournaments played, Makarova has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 44.44% win rate, whereas Barbulescu has excelled in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at a 70.21% success rate. This distinction in competitive levels offers further insight into their respective experiences and readiness for different tiers of competition.
Direct head-to-head encounters show Makarova leading with one win, although the robustness of this data may be limited due to the small sample size. The past match, characterized by a one-sided performance in favor of Makarova, might serve as a psychological edge heading into this contest. However, considering the broader picture of pressure situations and consistency, Barbulescu’s broader experience and recent form create a slight leaning towards her as the probable victor.
In summary, although Makarova has shown prowess in specific aspects, Barbulescu's consistent performance over the past year, higher win percentage on varying surfaces, and adaptability to high-pressure situations suggest that she might be more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
81%
(
57 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
22 of
32)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
19 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
48
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Selena Janicijevic
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
0-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Ana Bogdan
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
39
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
50
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
49%
(
40 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Elena Ruxandra Bertea
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
53%
(
42 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Eleni Tsetsou
37%
(
15 of
41)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Bianca Elena Barbulescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Franziska Sziedat
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
73)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
49%
(
40 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Maayan Laron
41%
(
19 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Elena Korokozidi
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Maria Sara Popa
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
8 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
45
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rositsa Dencheva
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Maayan Laron
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
74%
(
75 of
102)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Natalia Fehr
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Alexia Lavinia Puiac
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (250/202) | Win/Loss | 61% (97/62) |
| 53% (546/478) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (211/147) |
| 52% (4639/4366) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (1804/1481) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 135 | Aces Total | 125 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1511 | Total Double Faults | 418 |
| 1:24:44 | Average Match Time | 1:10:53 |
| 424.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 353.49 |
| 65% (17001/26020) | 1st Serve % | 62% (4341/7049) |
| 56% (9531/17001) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (2492/4341) |
| 42% (3794/9020) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1135/2708) |
| 51% (1840/3581) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (520/991) |
| 49% (12419/25372) | Return Points Win % | 49% (3531/7157) |
| 55% (245/443) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (96/158) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (34/56) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (9/24) |
| 60% (77/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (22/41) |
| 88% (233/205) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (92/83) |
| 12% (233/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (92/9) |
| 19% (218/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (67/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
