Edward Winter vs Connor Thomson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jul at 12:05 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Winter vs C. Thomson

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Winter 1 - 0 Thomson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Edward Winter winning 2 and Connor Thomson winning 0. The last match between Edward Winter and Connor Thomson was at the Nottingham 3 Challenger, 09-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Edward Winter getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Winter | 1 |
| Thomson | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Nottingham 3 Challenger(07-09-25)
E. Winter vs C. Thomson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $118,500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.05% (101-73) | Career Total W/L | 41.67% (15-21) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Winter vs C. Thomson Match Preview:
- Thomson has a significantly stronger second serve performance, winning 53.19% of those points compared to Winter's 44.77%. Could this give Thomson an edge?
- In recent return games, Thomson outperforms Winter by winning 55.32% of opponents' second serve points, while Winter captures 45.45%.
- Despite Winter having a better first serve return rate at 32.69%, Thomson's ability to handle second serves may be a pivotal factor.
- Under pressure, Thomson has shown more resilience by saving 71.43% of breakpoints, compared to Winter's 61.06%.
- Regarding overall performance, Thomson has a flawless record in the past year with one match played, while Winter has a more extensive record but at a 54.55% win rate.
- Both players excel on grass, but Thomson holds a 75% win rate on this surface compared to Winter’s 60%.
- Thomson has played matches against opponents with a lower average rank (562) versus Winter, facing competitors with a 397.89 average rank, indicating a possible higher competition level for Winter.
- In deciding sets, Thomson has an impeccable record of winning every deciding set in the past year, whereas Winter manages to win 43%.
- Winter converts a higher percentage of breakpoints at 30.89%, an important factor during critical game moments.
Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):
Given recent performance metrics, Thomson demonstrates superior skills on second serve points and under pressure, which could play a critical role in the outcome of the match. Their perfect record on deciding sets might also lend a psychological advantage if the match stretches to a final set.
On the other hand, Winter’s experience against higher-ranked opponents and their slightly better breakpoint conversion rate indicate they are battle-hardened and capable of seizing opportunities when presented.
The key battle appears to be between Thomson’s strong second serve strategy and Winter’s ability to convert break chances. While Winter's broader match experience and performance against tougher opponents are noteworthy, Thomson’s strengths may provide the edge needed for victory.
Based on the analysis of strengths, weaknesses, and current trends, Thomson is likely to win the upcoming tennis match.
Edward Winter vs Connor Thomson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Winter vs C. Thomson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:23:17 | Average Match Time | 1:23:17 |
| 70% (38/54) | 1st Serve % | 63% (39/62) |
| 76% (29/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) |
| 38% (6/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 50% (31/62) | Return Points Win % | 35% (19/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Winter Recent Matches Played
C. Thomson Recent Matches Played

E. Winter vs C. Thomson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.05% (101/73) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.67% (15/21) |
| 57.84% (225/164) | Sets Win/Loss | 43.90% (36/46) |
| 54.15% (1972/1670) | Games Win/Loss | 47.22% (373/417) |
| 59.21% (90/62) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 312 | Aces Total | 145 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 478 | Total Double Faults | 80 |
| 1:38:40 | Average Match Time | 1:24:46 |
| 408.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 376.67 |
| 65% (7004/10746) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1282/2055) |
| 68% (4730/7004) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (874/1282) |
| 51% (1894/3742) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (361/773) |
| 41% (503/1213) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (62/167) |
| 41% (4472/10779) | Return Points Win % | 36% (721/1978) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.16% (22/21) | Challenger W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 63.11% (77/45) | Futures W/L | 48.15% (13/14) |
| 58% (100/173) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (15/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (28/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
| 43% (17/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 85% (105/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (13/12) |
| 15% (105/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (13/1) |
| 17% (69/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (23/3) |