Edison Ambarzumjan vs Daniel Khazime Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W L W L
Form
W W W L W L W L L LHead To Head: Ambarzumjan 1 - 0 Khazime
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ambarzumjan winning 2 and Khazime winning 1. The last match between Ambarzumjan and Khazime was at the M15 Tsaghkadzor, 27-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Edison Ambarzumjan getting the victory 7-6(4) 5-7 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Edison Ambarzumjan | 1 |
| Daniel Khazime | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Tsaghkadzor(27-05-2025)
Edison Ambarzumjan
Daniel Khazime
7
6
5
7
6
4
| Ambarzumjan | Stats | Khazime |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (9-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (9-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 899 |
| Highest Rank | 850 | |
| 28 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 49% (62-64) | Career Total W/L | 49% (43-45) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Bencic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
06 Jul 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Noskova VS Anisimova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
06 Jul 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ambarzumjan VS Khazime H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Daniel Khazime
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
45%
(
57 of
126)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
40 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
51 of
126)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
||||
Ambarzumjan VS Khazime H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 17 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 3:4:15 | Average Match Time | 3:4:15 |
| 65% (72/111) | 1st Serve % | 45% (57/126) |
| 72% (52/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (41/57) |
| 49% (19/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (34/69) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 40% (51/126) | Return Points Win % | 36% (40/111) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ambarzumjan vs Khazime Match Preview :
- Ambarzumjan has shown stronger second serve performance in the last 6 months, winning 44.33% of points compared to Khazime's 40.47%. Could this give them an advantage? Possibly, as strong second-serve performance often correlates with winning outcomes.
- Both players have a competitive return game, but Ambarzumjan has a slight edge, winning 47.62% of points on opponents' second serves vs. Khazime's 45.01%.
- Analysis under pressure reveals Ambarzumjan has saved a higher percentage of breakpoints at 54.84%, while Khazime has saved 46.79%. Such resilience can be crucial in tight matches.
- Over the past year, Khazime has a win rate of 50% whereas Ambarzumjan stands at 42.86%. Does Khazime's higher win percentage signify a performance edge? It might, especially against evenly matched opponents.
- On surface performance, Ambarzumjan excels on Grass (winning 67% of matches), but both players struggle on Indoor Hard courts.
- In terms of player levels, Khazime has faced slightly weaker opponents (average rank 315.87), compared to Ambarzumjan (average rank 157.14).
- Deciding set stats are pivotal; Khazime has a massive advantage, winning 67% of deciding sets versus Ambarzumjan's 13%.
- For breakpoint conversion, Ambarzumjan has been marginally more successful, converting 36.84% of opportunities compared to Khazime's 34.07%.
Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):
Heading into the match, Ambarzumjan's second serve and return game statistics showcase a slight advantage. These aspects of their game could prove pivotal, especially in bringing tight points to their advantage.
However, when matches extend into a deciding set, Khazime has displayed exceptional resilience, winning a significant percentage of these crucial moments. This ability to perform under pressure casts Khazime as a formidable opponent, particularly if the match runs long.
Given the current statistics and performance trends, Khazime's consistent overall win rate and superior performance in deciding sets make them the more likely winner in this upcoming encounter.
Ambarzumjan vs Khazime Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Edison Ambarzumjan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruslan Tiukaev
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Karlis Ozolins
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Artem Bogomolov
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
115)
7
Aces
11
15
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
48 of
70)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
37 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
115)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Daniel Khazime
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
45%
(
57 of
126)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
40 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
51 of
126)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gergely Madarasz
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Daniel Khazime Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Brosset
Player
Daniel Khazime
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Daniel Khazime
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
45%
(
57 of
126)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
40 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
51 of
126)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Daniel Khazime
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Khazime
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasza Szajrych
Player
Daniel Khazime
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Khazime
Player
Ivan Denisov
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Daniel Khazime
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Khazime
Player
Credit Chaiyarin
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (62/64) | Win/Loss | 49% (43/45) |
| 50% (142/140) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (96/103) |
| 50% (1410/1411) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (963/952) |
| 50% (12/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (40/36) |
| 52% (37/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) |
| 39% (11/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 158 | Aces Total | 202 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 137 | Total Double Faults | 261 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:29:32 |
| 202.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 339.18 |
| 57% (2382/4144) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3178/5072) |
| 64% (1531/2382) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2057/3178) |
| 47% (836/1762) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (886/1894) |
| 40% (132/326) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (224/531) |
| 38% (1544/4044) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2056/4980) |
| 50% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (61/63) | Futures W/L | 49% (43/45) |
| 49% (62/126) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (43/87) |
| 58% (18/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (11/22) |
| 40% (12/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (14/24) |
| 84% (64/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (39/35) |
| 16% (64/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (39/4) |
| 13% (62/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (49/8) |
Ambarzumjan vs. Khazime Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
