Edda Mamedova vs Anna Frey Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Who performs better on the second serve in recent months? Edda Mamedova edges out with a 35.68% success rate compared to Anna Frey's 33.77%.
• In returning second serves, Anna Frey has a clear advantage, capturing 60.90% of these points while Edda Mamedova claims 51.16%.
• For first serve returns, Edda Mamedova dominates with a 37.47% success rate over Anna Frey's 30.04%.
• When under pressure, Edda Mamedova saves 46.15% of breakpoints, surpassing Anna Frey's 38.46%.
• Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Edda Mamedova maintains a winning percentage of 63.64%, compared to Anna Frey's much lower 21.43%.
• Regarding best surface performance, both players excel on different surfaces with identical win rates of 60%. Edda Mamedova is strong on Hard courts, while Anna Frey does well on Indoor Hard courts.
• Considering the competition level, Edda Mamedova has mostly played and succeeded in lower-tier events (70.37% success), whereas Anna Frey has struggled in higher-tier events, not managing a single win.
• Edda Mamedova's opponents have an average rank of 96.82, suggesting she faces less challenging competitors compared to Anna Frey's average opponent rank of 52.21.
• Which player performs better in deciding sets? Although Edda Mamedova wins 44% of these, Anna Frey edges ahead with a 50% win rate.
• Current event performance and personal track records at specific venues may also impact the outcome but need further updated data.

Editorial Prediction (November 8, 2025, UTC):

The statistical analysis suggests a few key insights that could dictate the outcome of this match. Edda Mamedova shows a slight advantage in second serve accuracy and breakpoint saves, indicating a stronger overall defense and ability to endure pressure.

However, Anna Frey demonstrates a superior return game, especially on her opponent's second serve, which could prove crucial in gaining an edge during critical points.

Both players excel on their preferred surfaces with identical win rates, but the different levels of competition they have faced suggest contrasting levels of consistency in performance. Edda’s higher overall win percentage and success in matches over the past year highlight her as a more consistent performer in similar matchups.

Ultimately, while both have strengths and weaknesses, Edda Mamedova's comprehensive advantage in multiple performance indicators makes her the likely favorite to win their upcoming encounter.