H. Mayot
To Win
E. Butvilas
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W W W W WForm
W W W W W L W W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Butvilas winning 1 and Misolic winning 2. The last match between Butvilas and Misolic was at the Pau Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Filip Misolic getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Pau Challenger(18-02-2025)
17 Mar 2025 / First
17 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 7-5 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Edas Butvilas
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
1
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Recent form analysis: In the past six months, there has been a slight difference in the second serve performance between Butvilas and Misolic. Butvilas has triumphed in 47.53% of points on their second serve, whereas Misolic has achieved a slightly higher success rate of 47.97%. These statistics bear a significant correlation to the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game assessment: Examining their recent form, Butvilas has confidently claimed 50.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Misolic has secured 47.93%. Furthermore, when it comes to first serve returns, Butvilas boasts a performance of 33.16%, while Misolic holds a steady 34.45%. This data significantly aids in determining the favorite in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
Under pressure analysis: When it comes to dealing with pressure situations, Butvilas has shown remarkable resilience by saving 63.54% of breakpoints in recent matches. On the other hand, Misolic has managed to save 56.78%, showcasing their capability to handle critical moments. This statistic proves to be quite useful in making in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Butvilas has emerged victorious in 67.05% of their matches (Win/Loss ratio of 59/29), while Misolic has a win percentage of 52.08% (Win/Loss ratio of 25/23). Examining their head-to-head records offers a general prediction overview of their upcoming encounter.
Surface expertise: Butvilas excels on hard surfaces, delivering an impressive win percentage of 63% (Win/Loss ratio of 44/26). Conversely, their performance on grass courts has been less remarkable, with a 0% win percentage (Win/Loss ratio of 0/1). Misolic, on the other hand, has proven to be highly competent on clay surfaces, winning 66% of their matches (Win/Loss ratio of 134/69). However, their performance on grass courts has been similar to Butvilas, with a win percentage of 0% (Win/Loss ratio of 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Butvilas has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a total win percentage of 73.33% (Win/Loss ratio of 33/12). Conversely, Misolic has predominantly played in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize money greater than $10K, achieving a win percentage of 48.57% (Win/Loss ratio of 17/18). When predicting the favored player based on these statistics, it is essential to consider the level of the events they have been competing in.
Opponent quality analysis: Analyzing their matches over the past 12 months, Butvilas has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 345.49. Comparatively, Misolic has faced players with an average ranking of 278.33.
Deciding set performance: For live predictions and betting enthusiasts, it is crucial to examine the players' performance in deciding sets. Over the past year, Butvilas has triumphed in 54% of such sets, while Misolic has achieved a higher success rate of 63% in all matches on the tour.
Current event H2H statistics: While analyzing player performance from previous matches is beneficial in predicting tennis outcomes, it is also important to consider current event stats, especially to gauge the form of the players. For details on current event statistics, please refer to the section below (if they have already played a match in the current event). Additionally, some players exhibit superior performances in specific events, making it crucial to consider such factors when predicting the overall outcome.
Break point conversion analysis: In recent matches, Butvilas has successfully converted 40.88% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Misolic has achieved a slightly lower conversion rate of 40% when presented with chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic proves to be vital for in-game live betting tips whenever either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are keen on exploring models for predicting tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. (Warning: Suitable for avid statisticians only)
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Stuart Parker
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Zsombor Piros
57%
(
66 of
116)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Christoph Negritu
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Keegan Smith
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Remy Bertola
Player
Edas Butvilas
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
27 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Philip Henning
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Edas Butvilas
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
11
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
42 of
51)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
23 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Edas Butvilas
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
1
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Edas Butvilas
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
94)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Filip Misolic
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Raphael Collignon
Player
Filip Misolic
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Pedro Cachin
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Edas Butvilas
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
1
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Filip Misolic
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Daniel Rincon
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Dominik Koepfer
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Jakub Paul
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Carlos Taberner
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Filip Misolic
Player
Rei Sakamoto
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Butvilas
View full predicted draw for Misolic