Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Edan Leshem vs Jay Clarke Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Leshem vs Clarke analysis and find out who is favored!
Edan Leshem vs Jay Clarke Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Leshem has won 38.27% of points on his second serve, while Clarke has won 52.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Leshem, in recent form, has won 55.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Clarke has won 54.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.78% and 39.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Leshem has saved 46.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Clarke has saved 59.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Leshem has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 9/ 10), with Clarke winning 72.06% (W/L 49/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Leshem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 265/ 162), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Clarke has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 124/ 63), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 10/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Leshem has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4), where as Clarke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.77% of matches (W/L 45/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Leshem winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Leshem winning 2 and Clarke winning 3. The last match between Leshem and Clarke was at the Oeiras 1 Challenger, 05-01-2023, Second, I.hard with Edan Leshem getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:54.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Leshem and Clarke have played a deciding set 1 times, with Leshem winning 1 times and Clarke 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Leshem winning 0, and Clarke 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Leshem has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.68 while Clarke has played against players with an average rank of 172.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Leshem has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Clarke has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Leshem has converted 48.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Clarke has converted 46.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Leshem 1 - 1 Clarke
865
Rank
249
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
334
Rank
153
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
58% (308-220)
Career Total W/L
57% (265-201)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
69% (22-10)
$26,870
Career Prize Money
$116,120
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Edan Leshem | Jay Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 23 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:54 | 1:47:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (101/152) | 57% (84/148) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (72/101) | 69% (58/84) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (24/51) | 55% (35/64) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (55/148) | 37% (56/152) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Edan Leshem
Player
Jay Clarke
70%
(
69 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Edan Leshem
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Edan Leshem | Jay Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 69% (22/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 64% (49/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (33/40) | 55% (401/330) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (19/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:23 | 2:2:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 119 | 172.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (159/240) | 60% (1396/2329) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (93/159) | 66% (921/1396) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (31/81) | 50% (468/933) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (14/29) | 46% (139/301) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (93/219) | 45% (1097/2425) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 75% (3/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 68% (19/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 70% (21/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 89% (19/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 11% (19/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 38% (13/5) |
Edan Leshem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Edan Leshem
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Edan Leshem
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
50
|
5-7 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Jordan Hasson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Emile Hudd
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Edan Leshem
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jay Clarke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Jay Clarke
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Jay Clarke
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
41%
(
27 of
66)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Jay Clarke
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Kane Bonsach Ganley
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Alejandro Manzanera Pertusa
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Matej Dodig
Player
Jay Clarke
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Mili Poljicak
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
52 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Vuk Radjenovic
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(9) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Leshem Vs Clarke Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
