R. Nijboer
To Win
N. Kicker
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L W W L LForm
L W W L L W W W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Lajovic winning 2 and Nijboer winning 0. The last match between Lajovic and Nijboer was at the Sassuolo Challenger, 17-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Dusan Lajovic getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Dusan Lajovic | 1 |
Ryan Nijboer | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Sassuolo Challenger(17-06-2025)
Lajovic | Stats | Nijboer |
---|---|---|
51% (24-23) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (27-22) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
118 | Ranking | 454 |
23 | Highest Rank | 371 |
35 | Age | 25 |
R | Plays | R |
14 | Titles | 3 |
54% (541-467) | Career Total W/L | 57% (282-214) |
$4,963,415 | Career Prize Money | $5,735 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
15 Jul 2025 / First
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
13 Jul 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
1:9:51 | Average Match Time | 1:9:51 |
69% (33/48) | 1st Serve % | 80% (39/49) |
82% (27/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (26/39) |
67% (10/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (3/10) |
60% (3/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
41% (20/49) | Return Points Win % | 23% (11/48) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nijboer demonstrates strong capabilities in foreign returns, suggesting his competitive edge in breaking Lajovic's serve. Comparatively, Lajovic's saving of breakpoints under pressure also poses a significant advantage.
The win percentages depict Nijboer as a consistent performer with a solid record. However, Lajovic's experience on the Main tour against superior-ranked rivals cannot be ignored.
The match's surface could play an essential role in prediction. While hard courts favor Nijboer, it's crucial to confirm the event surface for a more nuanced prediction.
Given these factors, Nijboer's broader range of strengths, especially in breaking serve and overall win rates, position him as the likely winner in this matchup. Nonetheless, it remains possible for Lajovic to leverage his tournament experience for a surprising upset.
Lajovic vs Nijboer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Billy Harris
Player
Dusan Lajovic
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Dusan Lajovic
69%
(
80 of
116)
1st Serve %
74%
(
96 of
130)
12
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
56 of
96)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
130)
135
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Arthur Bouquier
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Liam Draxl
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Taberner
Player
Dusan Lajovic
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Ryan Nijboer
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alec Deckers
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
37%
(
24 of
65)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Romain Faucon
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Jarno Jans
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Stijn Slump
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Ryan Nijboer
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Lorenzo Bocchi
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54% (541/467) | Win/Loss | 57% (282/214) |
53% (1290/1156) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (649/505) |
51% (12021/11565) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5670/5046) |
49% (116/120) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (97/67) |
59% (348/242) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (177/127) |
47% (69/78) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (8/20) |
23% (8/27) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
3044 | Aces Total | 1129 |
0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
1424 | Total Double Faults | 1744 |
1:22:9 | Average Match Time | 1:33:56 |
129.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 481.22 |
66% (40994/62452) | 1st Serve % | 63% (18772/29776) |
68% (28026/40994) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12550/18772) |
52% (11255/21458) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5046/11004) |
40% (2269/5685) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1529/3366) |
38% (23498/62444) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12920/30299) |
39% (35/54) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
51% (82/78) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
47% (18/20) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
49% (176/185) | Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) |
64% (140/78) | Challenger W/L | 43% (35/46) |
64% (90/51) | Futures W/L | 60% (246/164) |
55% (497/902) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (275/484) |
38% (34/90) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
50% (171/345) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (63/132) |
51% (159/312) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (76/162) |
83% (571/475) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (296/245) |
17% (571/95) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (296/51) |
14% (437/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (200/37) |