Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dragos Nicolae Madaras vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Madaras vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Dragos Nicolae Madaras vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Madaras has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Michalski has won 50.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Madaras, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 53.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Madaras has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 56.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Madaras has won 75% of matches played (W/L 33/ 11), with Michalski winning 58.06% (W/L 36/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Madaras has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 295/ 139), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 179/ 92), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Madaras has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 93.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 2), where as Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Madaras winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Madaras winning 3 and Michalski winning 2. The last match between Madaras and Michalski was at the M15 Antalya, 13-05-2021, Second, Clay with Daniel Michalski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Madaras and Michalski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Madaras winning 0 times and Michalski 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Madaras winning 0, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Madaras has played against opponents with an average rank of 251 while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 237.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Madaras has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Madaras has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 46.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Madaras 1 - 1 Michalski
326
Rank
191
High
26
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
318
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
66% (324-165)
Career Total W/L
62% (212-128)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$42,460
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dragos Nicolae Madaras | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 26 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:30 | 2:9:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (98/139) | 57% (96/167) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (63/98) | 59% (57/96) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (21/41) | 48% (34/71) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (9/24) | 70% (7/10) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (76/167) | 40% (55/139) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
60%
(
71 of
119)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
46 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Daniel Michalski
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dragos Nicolae Madaras | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (27/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (250/252) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:56:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 322.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1048/1680) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (661/1048) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (322/632) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (70/149) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (654/1605) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (10/0) |
Dragos Nicolae Madaras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Marco Cecchinato
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Sebastian Gima
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Madaras Vs Michalski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
